AUA 2019: Immersive Virtual Reality for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: Impact On Patient Education, Surgical Planning, and Treatment Outcome

Chicago, IL (UroToday.com) While CT and MRI imaging continue to improve in their ability to depict the anatomy, they remain limited in that they only provide two-dimensional images, which the surgeon must then mentally assemble into a 3D anatomical understanding. This is especially difficult in the preoperative planning process for percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). To address this challenge, investigators at the University of California, Irvine used patient-specific immersive virtual reality models to prepare for PCNL cases. 

Patients’ CT images were converted to virtual reality models (Figure 1), which surgeons and patients viewed on an Oculus Rift virtual reality headset prior to the PCNL. Preoperatively, surgeons recorded whether the model was helpful in preoperative planning (e.g. for choosing the appropriate calyx to enter), and patients recorded whether viewing the models improved their understanding of where the stone was located and if viewing the model lessened their preoperative anxiety about the procedure.

Indeed, both surgeons and patients found the virtual reality models helpful. For surgeons, the models enhanced their understanding of the patient’s anatomy and the optimal calyx of entry. In fact, after viewing the virtual reality models, surgeons changed their operative approach in 40% of cases. For patients, the models resulted in an improvement in the understanding of the location of their stone and also quelled their preoperative anxiety. Regarding operative outcomes compared to a retrospectively matched cohort, there was a significant decrease in fluoroscopy time and estimated blood loss in the virtual reality group (Table 1). 

The presenter was questioned about the retrospective nature of the matched-pair analysis, which he acknowledged was a limitation of the study. He did indicate that his group is currently performing a prospective randomized trial in order to assess the true effect of virtual reality for preoperative planning on operative outcomes. 
 
AUA2019_Virtual Reality Model.png

Figure 1: Virtual Reality Model. 
A)Transparent view of kidney and surrounding anatomy. Lower pole and interpolar renal calculi in yellow are highlighted by solid red arrows. B)Posterior view of pertinent anatomy; planned nephrostomy tract is above the 12th rib (green solid arrow). 
C)Intrarenal view as the iVR user proceeds above the 12th rib and “looks” into the planned upper pole calyceal point of entry (yellow solid arrow). 
D)View as the iVR user travels further through the upper pole calyx and along the upper pole infundibulum. The user visualizes the upper border of the yellow stone (thick red arrow) and can see how the stone branches into the lower pole (thin red arrow)

AUA2019_iVR_model_2.png
Table 1. Operative outcomes in virtual reality (iVR) and non-virtual reality (Non-iVR) groups

Authors: Egor Parkhomenko,1Mitchell O’Leary,1Shoaib Safiullah,2Sartaaj Walia,1Ryan James,3Cyrus Lin,1Roshan Patel,1Kamaljot Kaler,1Jaime Landman,1and Ralph Clayman1
Affiliation:
1Department of Urology, University of California, Irvine, Orange, CA
2Department of Urology, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO
3Department of Biomedical Informatics and Medical Education, University of Washington,  Seattle, WA

Presented and Written by Francis Jefferson, Department of Urology, University of California-Irvine) at the American Urological Association's 2019 Annual Meeting (AUA 2019), May 3 – 6, 2019 in Chicago, Illinois
E-Newsletters

Newsletter subscription

Free Daily and Weekly newsletters offered by content of interest

The fields of GU Oncology and Urology are rapidly advancing. Sign up today for articles, videos, conference highlights and abstracts from peer-review publications by disease and condition delivered to your inbox and read on the go.

Subscribe