Treatment decision making remains a complex task for localized prostate cancer. Decision aids for patients can support the medical consultation. However, it is not known if German urologists accept decision aids for patients.
Adoption of active surveillance (AS) is widely variable across urological communities. This suggests a need for more consistency in the counseling of patients. To address this need, we used the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method to develop appropriateness criteria and counseling statements for AS.
Cancer screening is an important tool for reducing morbidity and mortality in the elderly. In this article, performance characteristics of commonly used screening tests for colorectal, lung, prostate, breast, and cervical cancers are discussed.
This study aimed to explore the effects of a decision support intervention (DSI) and shared decision making (SDM) on knowledge, perceptions about treatment, and treatment choice among men diagnosed with localized low-risk prostate cancer (PCa).
Most professional organizations, including the American College of Physicians and U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, emphasize that screening for prostate cancer with the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test should only occur after a detailed discussion between the health-care provider and patient about the known risks and potential benefits of the test.
To describe the development and implementation of a prostate cancer screening intervention and risk assessment decision tool.
Community health promotion with pre- and post-education knowledge questionnaires.
Little is known about how physicians present diagnosis and treatment planning in routine practice in preference-sensitive treatment decisions. We evaluated completeness and quality of informed decision making in localized prostate cancer post biopsy encounters.
Widespread adoption and use of the practice of shared decision-making among health-care providers, especially urologists, has been limited. This study explores urologists' perceptions about their conversational practices leading to decision-making by newly diagnosed prostate cancer patients facing treatment.
To assess the influence of patient preferences and urologist recommendations in treatment decisions for clinically localized prostate cancer.
We enrolled 257 men with clinically localized prostate cancer (prostate-specific antigen <20; Gleason score 6 or 7) seen by urologists (primarily residents and fellows) in 4 Veterans Affairs medical centers.
Prostate cancer (PCa) is a common medical condition in the United States, with an estimated 16% of men receiving a diagnosis during their lifetime. Although it is the second leading cause of cancer-specific deaths among men, PCa will not be the cause of death for most men who are diagnosed with it.
BACKGROUND - Despite established evidence for using patient decision aids, their use with newly diagnosed prostate cancer patients remains limited, partly due to variability in the characteristics of decision aids. The objective of this study was to systematically review decision aids for their content, development process, effectiveness and potential for implementation in routine urologic practice for newly diagnosed prostate cancer patients.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE - While decision support tools such as decision aids can contribute to shared decision making, implementing these tools in daily practice is challenging. To identify and address issues around the use of decision support tools in routine care, this study explores the views of men and general practitioners on using a DA for early detection of prostate cancer.
There is controversy regarding performing concomitant anti-incontinence procedures at the time of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) repair. Data supports improvement in stress urinary incontinence (SUI) with concomitant sling, but increased adverse events.
Signup to receive urology industry news and updates via email