2019 ASCO GU Symposium

2019 ASCO GU Symposium

INTERVIEW WITH ANDREA APOLO
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Trials in Urothelial Cancer: Recent Updates and Future Outlook

VIEW ALL BLADDER CANCER VIDEOS

2019 ASCO GU Symposium

2019 ASCO GU Symposium

INTERVIEW WITH TOM KEANE
A Look at Established Paradigms in Androgen Deprivation Therapy in the Treatment of Advanced Prostate Cancer

VIEW ALL ADV PROSTATE VIDEOS

2019 ASCO GU Symposium

2019 ASCO GU Symposium

INTERVIEW WITH JEREMIE CALAIS
Molecular Imaging for Prostate Cancer Salvage Radiotherapy Planning

VIEW ALL IMAGING VIDEOS

2019 ASCO GU Symposium

2019 ASCO GU Symposium

INTERVIEW WITH FRED SAAD
Delaying Disease Progression in Early Nonmetastatic CRPC Treatment

VIEW ALL nmCRPC VIDEOS

Featured Videos

#WCE2014 - The use of a robotic remotely operated suction/irrigation (ROSI) system may lead to less post-operative blood loss after robotic pyeloplasty - Interview

TAIPEI, TAIWAN (UroToday.com) - Introduction and Objectives: Subjective surgeon experience with a Remotely-Operated Suction/Irrigation system (ROSI) has been associated with improved surgical field visibility through autonomy and flexibility of suction/irrigation tasks. We report our first objective experience of 11 patients who all underwent robotic pyeloplasty during which the ROSI was utilized for suction/irrigation tasks.

wceMethods: 22 consecutive patients underwent robotic pyeloplasty – the first 11 surgeries utilized a human-assistant to perform suction/irrigation tasks with a traditional rigid suction/ irrigation device (control group) and the next 11 surgeries utilized a surgeon or assistant-controlled, flexible suction/irrigation device (ROSI group). Age, BMI, surgery time, estimated blood loss, as well as immediate post-operative and discharge hematocrit values were compared between the two groups.

Results: The ROSI and control groups were similar in terms of age (35.3 vs. 44.2 years, p = 0.183), BMI (25.7 vs. 24.6, p = 0.69), surgery time (140.9 vs. 149.2 minutes, p = 0.39), and estimated blood loss (45.5 vs. 45.9 cc, p = 0.971). Compared to the ROSI group, the control group had a greater but non-significant immediate post-operative drop in hematocrit (2.40 vs. 4.43 %, p = 0.13) and a statistically significant drop in hematocrit at the time of discharge (3.05 vs. 5.95 %, p = 0.034).

Conclusions: The use of a flexible, surgeon-controlled suction/irrigation system may lead to less post-operative blood loss after robotic pyeloplasty, although this is likely not of clinical significance. However, the ROSI system does have the ability to enhance the surgeon’s surgical field visibility, possibly enabling him/her to better detect and cauterize small bleeding vessels.

Source of Funding: None

 

 
View an interview with Alon Y. Mass, one of the authors of this study.

 

Presented by Alon Y. Mass, MD and Michael Stifelman, MD at the 32nd World Congress of Endourology & SWL - September 3 - 7, 2014 - Taipei, Taiwan

New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY USA

 

 

Conference Coverage
 
Recent data from conferences worldwide
Journals
Publications focusing on urologic cancer treatments through original manuscripts
Everyday Urology Volume 4 Issue 1

Everyday Urology™ - Oncology Insights

PCAN cover

Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases

From the Editor

E-Newsletters

Newsletter subscription

Free Daily and Weekly newsletters offered by content of interest

The fields of GU Oncology and Urology are rapidly advancing. Sign up today for articles, videos, conference highlights and abstracts from peer-review publications by disease and condition delivered to your inbox and read on the go.

Subscribe