INTERVIEW WITH ARJUN BALAR
A New Era In Systemic Therapies, Pembrolizumab for High Risk Non-Muscle Invasive BCG-Refractory Patients

INTERVIEW WITH CHRISTOPHER LOGOTHETIS
Understanding Differences in Outcomes of Men with Prostate Cancer Based on Race and Ethnicity

INTERVIEW WITH HOWARD SOULE
Advances in PSMA-directed Radionuclide Therapy

INTERVIEW WITH COLIN PRITCHARD
Monoallelic vs Biallelic BRCA2 Alterations, PARP Inhibitors in Prostate Cancer

Videos
State-of-the-industry video lectures by leading urology experts
Featured Videos

#AUA14 - Experience with active surveillance (AS) in patients with renal mass ≥ 4cm: Assessment of growth kinetics and outcomes - Session Highlights

ORLANDO, FL USA (UroToday.com) - With increasing interest in understanding active surveillance (AS) as an option for the management of small renal masses, the growth kinetics of masses under 4 cm has been characterized by a number of investigators. Although the specific growth rate varies, and level I evidence is lacking, previous investigations consistently report slow growing tumors. In this study out of Fox Chase Cancer Center, the growth kinetics of larger tumors (≥ 4 cm), managed with active surveillance, were evaluated and compared with those who ultimately underwent definitive intervention.

auaThey reviewed their prospectively maintained database of patients with renal tumors and identified 68 patients with 72 tumors greater than 4 cm in diameter who were managed with AS. Of these, 23 patients ultimately received definitive intervention. At presentation, the average tumor size was 4.9 cm, with no difference between those managed solely with AS and those who received definitive intervention. There was a significant difference in age between the groups (76 versus 60 years for active surveillance versus intervention, respectively, p=0.0002). When comparing patients managed solely with AS versus those who received definitive intervention, the linear tumor growth rate (LGR) was higher in the intervention group (0.37 versus 0.68 cm/year, p=0.04), which is relatively consistent with kinetics for SRMs < 4 cm. On multivariate analysis, they found that tumor growth rate and younger age at presentation were associated with progression to surgery.

From these results they concluded that, as growth rates appear similar between small tumors (< 4 cm) and those they evaluated (cT1b or larger), initial management with active surveillance is reasonable, particularly in patients with "significant competing risks and limited life expectancy." During the discussion following the presentation, Dr. Mehrazin mentioned that two of the patients who demonstrated higher growth rates (0.9 and 1.2 cm/year) and progressed to surgery were found to have tumors of oncocytoma and chromophobe RCC on examination of surgical specimens, indicating poor correlation between growth rate and tumor histopathology/grade. This interesting work expands on evidence supporting active surveillance, but also raises the question whether growth rate is a useful predictor of outcomes when managing patients expectantly.

Presented by Reza Mehrazin, MD at the American Urological Association (AUA) Annual Meeting - May 16 - 21, 2014 - Orlando, Florida USA

Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA USA

Written by Martin Hofmann, MD, University of California (Irvine), and medical writer for UroToday.com

 

 

Conference Coverage
 
Recent data from conferences worldwide
  • 2019 Annual Meeting / December 4-6 / Washington, DC
  • 2019 Annual Congress / October 17 - October 20 / Athens, Greece
  • 2019 Annual Meeting / October 3 - October 5 / Aarhus, Denmark
  • 2019 Annual Congress / September 27 - October 1 / Barcelona, Spain
  • 2019 Biennial Meeting / August 29-31 / Basel, Switzerland
  • 2019 Think Tank / August 8-10 / Washington, DC
  • 2019 Annual Meeting / May 31 - June 6 / Chicago, IL
  • 2019 Annual Meeting / May 3-6 / Chicago, IL
Journals
Publications focusing on urologic cancer treatments through original manuscripts