2019 ASCO GU Symposium

2019 ASCO GU Symposium

INTERVIEW WITH DENA BATTLE
Patient Perspectives on Cytoreductive Nephrectomy after the CARMENA Trial

VIEW ALL ASCO GU 2019 VIDEOS

Prostate Cancer Foundation 2018 Scientific Retreat

Prostate Cancer Foundation 2018 Scientific Retreat

INTERVIEW WITH OLIVER SARTOR
Overall Survival Benefit and Racial Disparities in African American Men with Metastatic Prostate Cancer

VIEW ALL PCF VIDEOS

2019 ASCO GU Symposium

2019 ASCO GU Symposium

INTERVIEW WITH KARIM FIZAZI
ARAMIS - Efficacy and Safety of Darolutamide in nmCRPC

VIEW ALL ASCO GU 2019 VIDEOS

2019 ASCO GU Symposium

2019 ASCO GU Symposium

INTERVIEW WITH JAMES GULLEY
Immunotherapy Across Genitourinary Malignancies

VIEW ALL ASCO GU 2019 VIDEOS

Featured Videos

EAU 2014 - Active surveillance in 853 men with low and intermediate risk prostate cancer - Session Highlights

STOCKHOLM, SWEDEN (UroToday.com) - Dr. J. J. Aning presented an abstract on a cohort of 853 men (mean age of 65 years) with low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer from Vancouver, Canada who were managed by active surveillance (AS). The primary aim of their study was to identify risk factors which lead to progression of prostate cancer while under AS. All men were 75-years-old or younger and had undergone restaging prostate biopsy, with at least 6 months of follow up. Their AS protocol involved 6 monthly PSA and DRE reviews in addition to rebiopsy of the prostate, with planned repeat biopsies every 2 years. Prostate cancer risk status was defined by National Comprehensive Cancer Network guideline criteria.

eauMean PSA at diagnosis was 6.5ng/ml, with mean follow up of 5 years. Of the cohort, 50%, 27% and 23% were classified as very low-, low-, or intermediate-risk prostate cancer, respectively. Three hundred-nine men progressed to active treatment, most commonly due to grade progression at re-biopsy (62%), followed by patient choice (10%), and PSA progression (8%). Dr. Aning and colleagues reported actuarial probability of remaining on AS at 1, 2, 5, 8 years: 95%, 81%, 60%, and 47%, respectively. They reported a significant difference in the risk of progression to treatment between very low risk and other groups (p = 0.002), but not between low and intermediate risk groups (p= 0.481). On multivariate analysis, they determined that increasing number of positive biopsy cores at diagnosis and PSA density were significant predictors of progression to treatment (p= < 0.001). Negative prostate biopsy prior to diagnosis was found to be a significant negative predictor of progression to treatment (p=0.01). Of those treated, 4% (n=15) had biochemical recurrence. Overall survival of their AS cohort was 97%, with 1 death due to prostate cancer. Institutions continue to show evidence that AS is certainly a safe and viable option in select cohorts of men with diagnosis of prostate cancer.

Presented by J. J. Aning at the 29th Annual European Association of Urology (EAU) Congress - April 11 - 15, 2014 - Stockholmsmässan - Stockholm, Sweden

Vancouver Prostate Centre, Vancouver, Canada

Written by Reza Mehrazin, MD, medical writer for UroToday.com

 

Conference Coverage
 
Recent data from conferences worldwide
Journals
Publications focusing on urologic cancer treatments through original manuscripts
Everyday Urology Volume 3 Issue 4

Everyday Urology™ - Oncology Insights

PCAN cover

Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases

From the Editor

E-Newsletters

Newsletter subscription

Free Daily and Weekly newsletters offered by content of interest

The fields of GU Oncology and Urology are rapidly advancing. Sign up today for articles, videos, conference highlights and abstracts from peer-review publications by disease and condition delivered to your inbox and read on the go.

Subscribe