| Prognostic Significance of Nondiagnostic Molecular Changes in Urine Detected by UroVysion Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization During Surveillance for Bladder Cancer - Abstract |
|
| Monday, 01 December 2008 | ||
|
Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA. To determine the outcomes for patients with nondiagnostic fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) (ie, < 4 gains of chromosomes 3, 7, or 17 in < /=3 cells). FISH detects urothelial carcinoma and is especially beneficial in patients with negative or atypical urine cytology findings. A positive result is defined as a gain of >/=2 chromosomes (3, 7, or 17) in 4 cells, isolated loss of 9p21 in 12 cells, or isolated gains of only 1 chromosome in >/=10% of cells. Most FISH-positive patients will develop recurrent urothelial carcinoma within 1 year. We compared the data from 149 patients with a nondiagnostic FISH result and >/=30 months of follow-up with the data from patients with a negative FISH result from the same period. The time to conversion to a positive FISH result or the development of a bladder tumor was recorded. Patients with nondiagnostic FISH results had significantly greater rates of progression to positive FISH findings or the development of a bladder tumor than did patients with negative FISH findings. Most progression occurred within 1 year. Patients with nondiagnostic FISH results and concurrent negative cytology and cystoscopy had a very low risk of developing recurrent disease, similar to that found with truly negative FISH results. Nondiagnostic FISH results are related to a greater risk of progression to positive FISH results and tumor recurrence than those with negative FISH findings. However, after controlling for negative cytologic and cystoscopic status, a nondiagnostic FISH result does not appear to be an independent predictor of disease recurrence, and aggressive investigation is not warranted. Written by: Go "Beyond the Abstract" - Read an Article Written by the Author for UroToday.com Reference: PubMed Abstract
Read an Editorial about this Article by a UroToday.com Contributing Medical Writer
Please log-in or register in order to submit comments. Powered by AkoComment! |
||