Technology diffusion and diagnostic testing for prostate cancer - Abstract

PURPOSE: While the dissemination of robotic prostatectomy and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) may fuel increased use of prostatectomy and radiotherapy, these new technologies may also have spillover effects related to diagnostic testing for prostate cancer.

Therefore, we examined the association of regional technology penetration with receipt of prostate specific antigen (PSA) testing and prostate biopsy.

METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, we included 117,857 men age 66 and older from the 5% sample of Medicare beneficiaries living in the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) areas from 2003 - 2007. Regional technology penetration was measured as the number of providers performing robotic prostatectomy or IMRT per population in a healthcare market (i.e., hospital referral region). We assessed the association of technology penetration with rates of PSA testing and prostate biopsy with generalized estimating equations.

RESULTS: High technology penetration was associated with increased rates of PSA testing (442 versus 425 per 1,000 person-years, p< 0.01) and similar rates of prostate biopsy (10.1 versus 9.9 per 1,000 person-years, p=0.69). The impact of technology penetration on PSA testing and prostate biopsy was much smaller than the effect of age, race, and comorbidity (e.g., PSA testing rate per 1,000 person-years: 485 versus 373 for men with only one versus 3+ co-morbid conditions, p< 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS: Increased technology penetration was associated with slightly higher rates of PSA testing and no change in prostate biopsy rates. Collectively, our findings temper concerns that adoption of new technology accelerates diagnostic testing for prostate cancer.

Written by:
Schroeck FR, Kaufman SR, Jacobs BL, Skolarus TA, Miller DC, Weizer AZ, Montgomery JS, Wei JT, Shahinian VB, Hollenbeck BK.   Are you the author?
Division of Health Services Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Division of Urologic Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.

Reference: J Urol. 2013 May 10. pii: S0022-5347(13)04342-5.
doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.05.007


PubMed Abstract
PMID: 23669564

UroToday.com Prostate Cancer Section