Home
October 2009 November 2009 December 2009
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
Week 45 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Week 46 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Week 47 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
Week 48 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Week 49 29 30

Treatment Show Comments PDF Print E-mail
  
  • Expectant management
    • Small lesions [<3.0 cm] have a minimal risk of metastasis and increase in size approximately 6 mm per year. In elderly and very ill patients minimal intervention may be warranted.
  • Percutaneous or laparoscopic ablation
    • CT guided radiofrequency ablation - potential minimally invasive therapy requiring further follow-up
    • Laparoscopic cryosurgical ablation - less invasive ablation technique will require further follow-up
    • These and similar technologies promising and suited to the higher incidence of smaller lesions detected incidentally.
  • Nephron-sparing surgery
    • Local recurrence rate 1-2%
    • 15% of small lesions may not be renal cell Ca
    • Preservation of renal function is laudable
    • Indicated in small lesions [<4cm], patients with poor renal function, bilateral disease, and solitary kidney
    • Renal cooling and intraoperative ultrasound required in more difficult cases.
    • Open vs. laparoscopic approach based on tumor location, size, and operator experience.
  • Laparoscopic nephrectomy
    • Pure laparoscopic and "hand-assisted" techniques available. Hand- assisted approach has promulgated the technique, feasible for most tumors <8-10 cm depending on location.
    • Operative time longer, hospital stay and pain requirement less, time to normal function shorter than flank incision.
    • Learning curve associated with this approach
  • Classic Radical Nephrectomy
    • Gold standard of comparison. Performed through several different flank or subcostal approaches. Well tolerated.
    • Minimal role for aggressive lymphadenectomy. Nodes generally removed from ipsilateral great vessel.
    • Adrenalectomy not required if preoperative imaging is normal or if the renal tumor is in the mid or lower pole of the kidney.
  • Inferior vena cava extension
    • Sub classification based on cranial extent of lesion figure 1
    • Patient prognoses based on stage of lesion and not extent of thrombus
    • Complexity of surgery ranges from partial clamping of the vena cava to cardiopulmonary bypass with hypothermia and circulatory arrest. Mortality 2-14 %.

      Figure 1 The different classifications of renal tumors with inferior vena caval involvement. Each presentation requires implementation of specific surgical techniques. (Reproduced from Skinner DG, Lieskovsky G, eds: Diagnosis and Management of Genitourinary Cancer, 1988, p 697.)

  • Metastatic disease - Surgery
    • Outcome with metastatic disease depends on performance status
    • Low volume metastasis, especially pulmonary involvement tend to respond best.
    • Recent data to suggest a slight but statistically significant survival benefit if nephrectomy performed in conjunction with immunotherapy. Patients with significant disease burden and poor performance status less likely to benefit.
  • Metastatic disease - Medical therapy
    • Few cytoreductive agents have any significant impact on renal cell carcinoma
    • Radiation therapy has little proven effect on renal cell carcinoma
    • Cytokine therapy [IL-2] demonstrates a complete response in 4% of patients and a partial response in 12-20% of patients
    • Antiangiogenesis agents have theoretical promise for this disease

References

  • Bostwick DG, Eble JN: Diagnosis and classification of renal cell carcinoma. Urol Clin N Am 26:627-635, 1999.
  • Caddeddu JA, Ono Y, Clayman RV, et al: Laparoscopic nephrectomy for renal cell cancer: Evaluation of efficacy and safety: A multicenter experience. Urology 52:773-777, 1998.
  • Levy DA, Slaton JW, Swanson DA, Dinney CP: Stage specific guidelines for surveillance after radical nephrectomy for local renal cell carcinoma. J Urol 15:1163-1167, 1998.
  • Montie JM: Lymphadenectomy for renal cell carcinoma. Semin Urol 7:181-185, 1989.
  • Motzer RJ, Bander NH, Nanus DM: Renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med 335:865-875, 1996.
  • Novick AC: Renal-sparing surgery for renal cell carcinoma. Urol Clin North Am 20:277-282, 1993.
  • Sagalowsky AI, Kadesky KT, Ewalt DM, Kennedy TJ: Factors influencing adrenal metastasis in renal cell carcinoma. J Urol 151:1181-1184, 1994.
  • Skinner DG, Pritchett RT, Lieskovsky G, Boyd SD, Stiles QR: Vena caval involvement by renal cell carcinoma. Surgical resection provides meaningful long-term survival. Ann Surg 210:387-394, 1989.
  • Sufrin G, Cashon S, Golio A, Murphy GP: Paraneoplastic and serologic syndromes of renal adenocarcinoma. Semin Urol 7:158-171, 1989.
  • Yang JC, Topalian SL, Parkinson D, et al: Randomized comparison of high-dose and low-dose intravenous interleukin 2 for the therapy of metastatic renal cell carcinoma: An interim report. J Clin Oncol 12:1572-1576, 1994.

Reader Comments
Written by This email address is being protected from spam bots, you need Javascript enabled to view it on 2008-08-08 18:31:58
I appreciate any and all information related to this topic. I impatiently await the day something is discovered that will help me deal with my persistant pain.
Consultant Urologist
Written by This email address is being protected from spam bots, you need Javascript enabled to view it on 2007-10-21 01:50:40
Very good & informative.
MS. C.
Written by This email address is being protected from spam bots, you need Javascript enabled to view it on 2007-02-03 23:05:05
WHEN I WAS DIAGNOSED WITH I.C. 10 YEARS AGO I WAS GIVEN TEN AND A HALF MONTHS OF WEEKLY DMSO (RIMSO) INSTILLATIONS. I NOTICED MY EYESIGHT WAS BEING ADVERSLY AFFECTED DURING THIS TIME. AFTER MUCH RESEARCH THRU THE VETERINARY DEPT. AT UGA I WAS INFORMED THAT DMSO IS A SOLVENT THAT MAY ATTACK SOFT TISSUE AND THIS IN MY CASE IT WAS MY EYESIGHT. MY VISION WENT FROM 20/20 TO 20/95. I REALIZED AFTER MY RESEARCH THAT THESE TREATMENTS SHOULD HAVE BEEN DONE FOR NO MORE THAN 6 WEEKS BUT I WOULD LIKE TO ADVISE OTHER I.C. PATIENTS TO TAKE CAUTION AND DISCUSS THE POSSIBLE SIDE EFFECTS WITH THEIR UROLOGIST BEFORE PROCEEDING.

Please log-in or register in order to submit comments.

Powered by AkoComment!

 
User Rating: / 0
PoorBest


 

Bookmark and Share

Member's Section

Login

Sign Up

Quick Search

Meet the Expert


All Experts


Featured Conference

Working with Industry

Case Studies
Sponsorship Opportunities

Renal Cancer
Sponsored By