Home
February 2010 March 2010 April 2010
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
Week 9 1 2 3 4 5 6
Week 10 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
Week 11 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Week 12 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
Week 13 28 29 30 31

EAU 2007 - AUA Lecture at the EAU 2007 - “The Role of Robotics in Urology” Show Comments PDF Print E-mail
  
Thursday, 29 March 2007

BERLIN, GERMANY (UroToday.com) - EAU 2007 - Mani Menon, MD Detroit, Michigan, USA presented "The Role of Robotics in Urology" as the AUA Lecture at the plenary session of the EAU on Friday March 23, 2007.

He started with a 3-D video of a robotic laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. His technique was discussed with the video, which was received with applause. Dr. Menon has completed 3,100 of these cases. Despite no clear evidence that robotic RP has no huge advantages over open surgery, there is a significant growth in this market. The market is primarily coming from patient "advertising" to other patients by word of mouth and use of the internet. The perceived benefit is likely based upon decreased blood loss and quicker recovery. He hypothesized that this leads to decreased surgical and medical complications. Complications have a negative impact on hospital reimbursement. Based upon Medicare data, Begg in the NEJM in 2002 found that the complication rate from open radical prostatectomy was 28-35%. In a study by Dr. Lu-Yao, the surgical complication rates were virtually identical and medical complications were about 13-20%. Pure laparoscopic prostatectomy series report complication rates of about 11%. In his robotic data, medical complications were <1%. Thus, while surgical complication rates are not very different, medical complications are much less. However, he pointed out that this was not randomized data, but with the large difference (>20%) statistical methods suggest that randomized trials are not necessary to validate the difference. The difference between robotic and lap may need better study, since only a 10% difference in medical complications exist.

He stated that the benefits of minimally invasive surgery are physiological as well as surgical. Physiological benefits are more evident for complex procedures than simple procedures. Thus, the future of robotics in general, may be in making complex minimally invasive surgery safer across multiple surgical procedures. He did point out that his views are his own and do not reflect those of the AUA.

EAU 2007 Conference Coverage on UroToday.com

Written by Christopher P. Evans, MD, a Contributing Editor with UroToday.

Reader Comments

Please log-in or register in order to submit comments.

Powered by AkoComment!

 
User Rating: / 0
PoorBest


 

Bookmark and Share
< Prev   Next >

Member's Section

Login

Sign Up

Quick Search