Home
October 2008 November 2008 December 2008
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
Week 44 1
Week 45 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Week 46 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Week 47 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
Week 48 23 24 25 26 27 28 29
Week 49 30

Transcorporal Artificial Urinary Sphincter Placement for Incontinence in High-risk Patients After Treatment of Prostate Cancer - Abstract Show Comments PDF Print E-mail
  
Monday, 08 September 2008

University of California, San Francisco, School of Medicine, San Francisco, California.

To investigate the transcorporal (TC) vs standard (ST) approach of artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) placement for incontinence after treatment of prostate adenocarcinoma (PCa) with radiotherapy or surgery, or both.

A database was created to include the data from all patients who had undergone AUS placement from January 2000 to August 2005 at the University of California, San Francisco, Medical Center. We noted the demographic features, comorbidities, PCa therapy, technique for AUS placement, and postoperative outcome. The continence and failure rates were recorded for TC AUS placement in patients previously treated for PCa.

A total of 30 patients underwent aus surgery during the study period: 26 for incontinence after PCa treatment. Of the 26 patients, 18 had undergone ST (ST group) and 8 had undergone TC (TC group) AUS placement, with a minimal follow-up of 12 months and a mean follow-up of 31 and 28 months, respectively. The 2 groups did not differ widely in age or comorbidities. Of the patients in the ST and TC groups, 44% and 50% had undergone external beam radiotherapy or brachytherapy and 78% and 100% had undergone radical prostatectomy, respectively. Of the patients in the ST and TC groups, 22% and 89% had undergone >/=2 types of urethral surgery before AUS placement, respectively. A total of 50% of TC group underwent TC placement without having undergone a previous sling or ST AUS procedure. The AUS removal rates were equivalent between the 2 groups at 2 years. Finally, the success rate for social continence was 69% and 81% for ST and TC group, respectively.

The results of our study, with 2 years of follow-up, have shown that TC AUS placement is an effective salvage or primary incontinence treatment for high-risk patients after PCa therapy.

Written by:
Aaronson DS, Elliott SP, McAninch JW.   Are you the author?

Reference:
Urology. 2008 Aug 25. Epub ahead of print.
doi:10.1016/j.urology.2008.06.065

PubMed Abstract
PMID:18752838

 

Go "Beyond the Abstract" - Read an Article Written by the Author for UroToday.com

UroToday.com Prostate Cancer Section

 

Reader Comments

Please log-in or register in order to submit comments.

Powered by AkoComment!

 
User Rating: / 0
PoorBest


 
< Prev   Next >