Home
September 2008 October 2008 November 2008
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
Week 40 1 2 3 4
Week 41 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Week 42 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
Week 43 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Week 44 26 27 28 29 30 31

Mayo Clinic Validation of the D'Amico Risk Group Classification for Predicting Survival Following Radical Prostatectomy Show Comments PDF Print E-mail
  
Thursday, 15 May 2008

BERKELEY, CA (UroToday.com) - Dr. Boorjian and colleagues from the Mayo Clinic validated the D’Amico risk classification of predicting survival following radical prostatectomy (RP) using their single institution cohort of 7,591 patients.

The patients underwent radical prostatectomy between 1987 and 2003 by multiple surgeons, but using standardized techniques. Patients who were in the high risk D’Amico group were older and had a greater percent of aggressive prostate cancer at the time of radical prostatectomy including pathological T3/4 tumors, pathological Gleason 8-10 cancer and positive surgical margins. Over the time course of the study a stage migration was noted between the periods 1987-1992 and 1999-2003; a decline in high-risk patients from 34% to 14 % and an increase in low-risk patients from 22% to 55% occurred. Following radical prostatectomy 15% of patients received adjuvant therapy. For low, intermediate and high risk patients 6%, 11%, and 24% received adjuvant androgen deprivation therapy, respectively.

At a median follow-up of 7.7 years, 1,866 of the 7,591 patients had biochemical recurrence; 406 experienced local recurrence, 290 relapsed systemically and 954 died including 154 deaths from prostate cancer. The hazard ratio of death from CaP following radical prostatectomy was 11.5 for high-risk patients and 6.3 for intermediate-risk patients compared to low-risk patients. The authors confirmed that the D’Amico risk classification stratified patients for each outcome measured. A further analysis confirmed the ability for the D’Amico classification to predict outcomes during the PSA era despite the changing distribution of risk group stratification. The addition of surgical outcomes such as pathologic Gleason score, stage and margin status improved the predictive ability of the model for cancer specific survival.

Boorjian SA, Karnes RJ, Rangel LJ, Bergstralh EJ, Blute ML

J Urol. 2008 Apr;179(4):1354-60
doi 10.1016/j.juro.2007.11.061


PubMed Abstract
PMID: 18289596

\n This email address is being protected from spam bots, you need Javascript enabled to view it

UroToday.com Prostate Cancer Section

Written by Christopher P. Evans, MD, a Contributing Editor with UroToday.

Reader Comments

Please log-in or register in order to submit comments.

Powered by AkoComment!

 
User Rating: / 0
PoorBest


 
< Prev   Next >