Home
October 2009 November 2009 December 2009
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
Week 45 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Week 46 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Week 47 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
Week 48 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Week 49 29 30

Intermixed Normal Tissue Within Prostate Cancer: Effect on MR Imaging Measurements of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient and T2--Sparse Versus Dense Cancers - Abstract Show Comments PDF Print E-mail
  
Wednesday, 26 November 2008

Joint Department of Medical Imaging, Princess Margaret Hospital, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Rm 3-958, 610 University Ave, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 2M9.

To investigate differences in apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and T2 values between dense and sparse regions in prostate cancer.

Eighteen patients (median age, 61 years; range, 44-72 years) gave informed consent for this retrospective Research Ethics Board-approved study. Prior to radical prostatectomy, ADC (b value, 600 sec/mm(2)) and T2 maps were obtained by using 1.5-T magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. Twenty-eight peripheral zone (PZ) tumors were reviewed by using whole-mount histologic findings, and regions assessed to contain primarily (>60%) normal PZ tissue were delineated. Tumors were categorized as "sparse" if more than 50% of their cross-sectional areas were these primarily normal PZ regions and were considered "dense" otherwise. Normal PZ tissue was outlined separately on the same section. Tumor and normal tissue outlines were transferred to corresponding ADC and T2 maps, and median values were calculated. Values were compared by using multiple regression analysis. Matched-pair tumor-to-normal tissue differences and log(2)-transformed ratios were assessed by using nonparametric tests.

Thirty-six percent (10 of 28) of tumors were sparse; 64% (18 of 28) were dense. For both overall and intrapatient comparisons, dense tumors had significantly lower ADC and T2 values than normal PZ tissue (P < .05), but no significant differences were observed between sparse tumors and normal tissue. Log(2)-transformed tumor-to-normal tissue ratios were significantly less than zero for dense tumors for both ADC and T2 (P < .01) measurements but not for sparse tumors. Both matched-pair differences and log(2)-transformed ratios were significantly different between sparse and dense tumors (P < .01). ADC and T2 values were moderately correlated (Pearson correlation coefficient range, r = 0.770-0.804).

Sparse prostate tumors have similar ADC and T2 values to those of normal PZ tissue. This may limit MR imaging detection and the assessment of tumor volume of some cancers.

Written by:
Langer DL, van der Kwast TH, Evans AJ, Sun L, Yaffe MJ, Trachtenberg J, Haider MA.   Are you the author?

Reference:
Radiology. 2008 Dec;249(3):900-8.
doi:10.1148/radiol.2493080236

PubMed Abstract
PMID:19011187

 

UroToday.com Prostate Cancer Section

 

Reader Comments

Please log-in or register in order to submit comments.

Powered by AkoComment!

 
User Rating: / 0
PoorBest


 

Bookmark and Share
< Prev   Next >

Member's Section

Login

Sign Up

Quick Search

Meet the Expert


All Experts


Featured Conference

Media and Publisher

Advertising Rates
Reprints

Working with Industry

Case Studies
Sponsorship Opportunities

Prostate Cancer
Sponsored by