Home
October 2008 November 2008 December 2008
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
Week 44 1
Week 45 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Week 46 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Week 47 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
Week 48 23 24 25 26 27 28 29
Week 49 30

Impact of Body Mass Index on Biochemical Recurrence Rates After Radical Prostatectomy: An Analysis Utilizing Propensity Score Matching - Abstract Show Comments PDF Print E-mail
  
Wednesday, 16 April 2008

Department of Urology, The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland.

To investigate the significance of body mass index (BMI) as an independent predictor of biochemical recurrence in men treated with surgery for clinically localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate.

A total of 1877 obese patients who underwent radical prostatectomy were matched to overweight and normal-weight patients in a 1:1 ratio on the basis of propensity scores. This resulted in an overall study population of 5631 men. Clinicopathologic characteristics and biochemical recurrence outcomes after surgery were compared between the three BMI cohorts.

Normal-weight patients exhibited lower-grade disease compared with overweight and obese patients (P = 0.021). Lower BMI was also significantly associated with lower rates of positive surgical margins (P <0.001) and extraprostatic extension (P <0.001). Body mass index was not associated with lymph node involvement (P = 0.226) or seminal vesicle invasion (P = 0.142). Body mass index, age, biopsy Gleason score, preoperative prostate-specific antigen level, and clinical tumor stage were independent predictors of biochemical recurrence (P <0.001).

Propensity score-based matched analyses indicate that higher BMI is associated with adverse pathologic findings and is a strong independent predictor of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. These results support the hypothesis that inherent differences may exist in the biological properties of prostate cancer in obese men compared with normal-weight men. Therefore, BMI is an important criterion to consider during subsequent decision making and counseling of patients with prostate cancer.

Written by
Magheli A, Rais-Bahrami S, Trock BJ, Humphreys EB, Partin AW, Han M, Gonzalgo ML.

Reference
Urology. 2008 Apr 1. Epub ahead of print.
doi:10.1016/j.urology.2008.01.052

PubMed Abstract
PMID:18387658

UroToday.com Prostate Cancer Section

Reader Comments

Please log-in or register in order to submit comments.

Powered by AkoComment!

 
User Rating: / 0
PoorBest


 
< Prev   Next >