Home
October 2008 November 2008 December 2008
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
Week 44 1
Week 45 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Week 46 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Week 47 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
Week 48 23 24 25 26 27 28 29
Week 49 30

Does Educational Printed Material Manage to Change Compliance with Prostate Cancer Screening? - Abstract Show Comments PDF Print E-mail
  
Monday, 28 April 2008

Outpatient Department, General Hospital of Thebes, Thebes, Greece.

This email address is being protected from spam bots, you need Javascript enabled to view it

The effects of printed educational material on cancer screening in women (Pap test and mammography) are well documented and confirmed by several studies. The aim of our study was to evaluate the impact of similar printed educational material on prostate cancer screening by PSA and DRE.

Thousand five hundred men aged between 50 and 86 years of age, who attended our institutions for various medical conditions except prostate-related conditions, were randomly assigned to two study groups. Men in the informed group, received an educational leaflet with simple, general information on prostate cancer screening methods given by their physician along with treatment and other regular recommendations, while men in the non-informed group, were only informed by their physician in the examination room during an interview.

After 24 months, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of DRE screening. The percentages of men who were actually screened by DRE were 4 and 5% in the informed and non-informed groups, respectively, while the difference in the percentages of PSA screening was of statistical significance, with 31% of men screened in the non-informed group as compared to 93% of men screened in the informational leaflet group.

A single, one-shift distribution of printed educational material on prostate cancer screening, changed their attitude regarding prostate cancer screening only in favour of PSA testing, while did not manage to change the DRE acceptance behavior. However, since the combination of the two tests is more sensitive for diagnosis than either one alone, there is a need of introducing intervention strategies, in the efforts of ameliorating the prostate cancer screening behavior.

Written by
Stamatiou K, Skolarikos A, Heretis I, Papadimitriou V, Alevizos A, Ilias G, Karanasiou V, Mariolis A, Sofras F.

Reference
World J Urol. 2008 Apr 18. Epub ahead of print.
doi:10.1007/s00345-008-0258-z

PubMed Abstract
PMID:18421460

UroToday.com Prostate Cancer Section

Reader Comments

Please log-in or register in order to submit comments.

Powered by AkoComment!

 
User Rating: / 5
PoorBest


 
Visitor Ratings:
Healthcare Professionals:
5 (7 votes)

Patients:
4 (2 votes)