|
Hand Assisted Laparoscopic Training for Postgraduate Urologists: The Role of Mentoring |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Friday, 13 August 2004 |
BERKELEY, CA (UroToday Inc.) - It is well recognized that weekend courses alone do not provide
community urologists with the necessary skills and confidence to incorporate laparoscopic renal
surgery into their clinical practice.
|
BERKELEY, CA (UroToday Inc.) - It is well recognized that weekend courses alone do not provide
community urologists with the necessary skills and confidence to incorporate laparoscopic renal
surgery into their clinical practice. Other investigators have shown that at best 50% of
urologists attending laparoscopic courses will be performing laparoscopic renal surgery 5
years following their training. In an effort to improve this rate of "take" the educators
at this institution offered mentoring to all urologists participating in their hand assisted
laparoscopy (HAL) courses over an 8-month period of time. The courses included 25% didactic
and 75% porcine laboratory experience. The mentoring entailed actually scrubbing in and
assisting the training surgeon by one of the training centers expert surgeons or a surgeon
well experienced in laparoscopic renal surgery at the trainees center.
Surgeons who
completed the course and underwent mentoring were more likely (93%) to perform laparoscopic
cases after 6 months of follow-up than those who were not mentored (44%). While this study
is limited by its retrospective pattern, short follow-up and questionnaire recall bias, it
does support the impact of mentoring on urologists clinical practice patterns in laparoscopic
renal surgery. It is often challenging to provide credentialing and medical liability coverage
for the mentors, depending on the region or state. However, it is less complicated when the
mentor is licensed within the same state as the trainee. Mentoring does provide a useful
adjunct to postgraduate urologic training and the integration of the challenging laparoscopic
skills into the community based practice of urology. Hopefully this report will inspire other
centers involved with post-graduate education in minimally invasive urologic surgery to provide
mentoring as part of the training curriculum.
J Urol 172: 286-289, July 2004.
|
Please log-in or register in order to submit comments. Powered by AkoComment! |