Home
April 2008 May 2008 June 2008
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
Week 18 1 2 3
Week 19 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Week 20 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
Week 21 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
Week 22 25 26 27 28 29 30 31

Single-Port Laparoscopic Surgery in Urology: Initial Experience Show Comments PDF Print E-mail
  
Thursday, 13 March 2008

BERKELEY, CA (UroToday.com) - The hottest area of minimally invasive surgery is now that of NOTES (natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery) and SPA (single port access). However, most of the work has been in the laboratory and very little has seen the light of clinical experience. Herein, using a novel Uni-X Single Port Access Laparoscopic System (Pnavel Systems, Morganville, NJ), the authors report successfully performing renal cryotherapy (4), wedge biopsy of a kidney (1), abdominal sacrocolpopexy (4), and even radical nephrectomy (1). The single access port is placed via a 1.5 cm incision; the port has 3 portals for passage of a 5 mm flexible steerable laparoscopic endoscope and 2, 5 mm articulating instruments. Hence, the endoscope and instruments can be triangulated at broader angles than would be possible with straight instruments or a rigid endoscope passed through the same port.

The single SPA nephrectomy did require an extra 10 mm port which was placed where a 4 cm incision was planned in order to remove the kidney intact. All procedures were successfully accomplished; the average hospital stay was 2.8 days. Unfortunately, no data are provided with regard to use of analgesics, in hospital analog pain scores, or short term convalescence. Likewise, at this point there are no financial data provided with regard to cost of the SPA port or the specialized, apparently disposable, articulating/rotating instrumentation. The next challenge is to answer the aphorism: "All things good were once new, but all things new are not necessarily good.". At this point in time, this new approach could easily be subjected to a prospective randomized study be it for sacrocolpopexy or renal cryotherapy. At the very least, it will need a retrospective controlled analysis in the process of determining its proper place in the less invasive armamentarium. Regardless, the authors need to be congratulated for pushing the envelope forward and providing the Phase I/II information necessary for progression to a definitive Phase III trial.

Kaouk JH, Haber GP, Goel RK, Desai MM, Aron M, Rackley RR, Moore C, Gill IS

Urology. 2008 Jan;71(1):3-6
doi:10.1016/j.urology.2007.11.034


PubMed Abstract
PMID: 18242353

read other UroToday.com Editors Picks

\n This email address is being protected from spam bots, you need Javascript enabled to view it

Written by Ralph V. Clayman, MD, a Contributing Editor with UroToday.

Reader Comments

Please log-in or register in order to submit comments.

Powered by AkoComment!

 
User Rating: / 5
PoorBest


 
Visitor Ratings:
Healthcare Professionals:
4 (8 votes)

Patients:
5 (2 votes)

No Affiliation:
4 (1 votes)