Home
October 2009 November 2009 December 2009
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
Week 45 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Week 46 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Week 47 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
Week 48 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Week 49 29 30
Reach urologists

Periurethral suspension stitch during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Description of the technique and continence outcomes - Abstract Show Comments PDF Print E-mail
  
Friday, 31 July 2009

Global Robotics Institute, Florida Hospital Celebration Health, Celebration, FL 34747, USA.

University of Central Florida School of Medicine, Orlando, FL 32826-0116, USA.

Several studies have shown that robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) is feasible, with favorable complication rates and short hospital times. However, the early recovery of urinary continence remains a challenge to be overcome.

We describe our technique of periurethral retropubic suspension stitch during RALP and report its impact on early recovery of urinary continence.

We analyze prospectively 331 consecutive patients who underwent RALP, 94 without the placement of suspension stitch (group 1) and 237 with the application of the suspension stitch (group 2).

The only difference between the groups was the placement of the puboperiurethral stitch after the ligation of the dorsal venous complex (DVC). The periurethral retropubic stitch was placed using a 12-in monofilament polyglytone suture on a CT-1 needle. The stitch was passed from right to left between the urethra and DVC, and then through the periostium on the pubic bone. The stitch was passed again through the DVC, and then through the pubic bone in a figure eight, and then tied.

Continence rates were assessed with a self-administered validated questionnaire (Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite [EPIC]) at 1, 3, 6, and 12 mo after the procedure. Continence was defined as the use of no absorbent pads or no leakage of urine.

In group 1, the continence rate at 1, 3, 6, and 12 mo postoperatively was 33%, 83%, 94.7%, and 95.7%, respectively; in group 2, the continence rate was 40%, 92.8%, 97.9%, and 97.9%, respectively. The suspension technique resulted in significantly greater continence rates at 3 mo after RALP (p=0.013). The median/mean interval to recovery of continence was also statistically significantly shorter in the suspension group (median: 6wk; mean: 7.338wk; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 6.387-8.288) compared to the nonsuspension group (median: 7wk; mean: 9.585wk; 95% CI: 7.558-11.612; log rank test, p=0.02).

The suspension stitch during RALP resulted in a statistically significantly shorter interval to recovery of continence and higher continence rates at 3 mo after the procedure.

Written by:
Patel VR, Coelho RF, Palmer KJ, Rocco B.   Are you the author?

Reference:
Eur Urol. 2009 Jun 16. Epub ahead of print.
doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2009.06.007

PubMed Abstract
PMID:19560260

UroToday.com Prostate Cancer Section

Reader Comments

Please log-in or register in order to submit comments.

Powered by AkoComment!

 
User Rating: / 1
PoorBest


 
Visitor Ratings:
Healthcare Professionals:
3 (1 votes)


Bookmark and Share

Member's Section

Login

Sign Up

Quick Search

Meet the Expert


All Experts


Featured Conference

Media and Publisher

Advertising Rates
Reprints

Working with Industry

Case Studies
Sponsorship Opportunities

Craft of Urologic
Surgery Sponsored By