Home
July 2008 August 2008 September 2008
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
Week 31 1 2
Week 32 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Week 33 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Week 34 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
Week 35 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
Week 36 31

Prevention and Management of Complications in Urological Laparoscopic Port Site Placement Show Comments PDF Print E-mail
  
Monday, 06 November 2006
BERKELEY, CA (UroToday.com) - This is an excellent review article encompassing all aspects of trocar placement and associated complications.

Of note, for decades, the placement of the Veress needle and the initial trocar have been "blind" procedures. Particularly anxiety provoking is the placement of the initial bladed trocar as this maneuver is fraught with the potential, albeit rare, for vascular injury and death. Advances in trocar technology have now provided the surgeon with nonbladed, dilating trocars which reduce the risk of vascular injury by nearly 8 fold and the risk of port site herniation by 10 fold. Furthermore, even 12 mm nonbladed placed ports can be removed, in most cases, without the need to close the fascia thereby decreasing operative time and expense. Indeed, in our operating room the only fascial closure still done is for midline umbilical ports > 10 mm and even that is not done in other centers. Furthermore with the optical bladeless trocars, one can now "look" one's way into the peritoneal cavity thereby eliminating the "blind" placement of the initial trocar following establishment of a Veress needle pneumoperitoneum.

European Urology 50: 958-968, November 2006

Written by Ralph V. Clayman, MD, a Contributing Editor with UroToday.

Reader Comments

Please log-in or register in order to submit comments.

Powered by AkoComment!

 
User Rating: / 0
PoorBest


 
< Prev   Next >