Home
August 2008 September 2008 October 2008
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
Week 36 1 2 3 4 5 6
Week 37 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
Week 38 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Week 39 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
Week 40 28 29 30

Characterization and Management of Postoperative Hemorrhage Following Upper Retroperitoneal Laparoscopic Surgery Show Comments PDF Print E-mail
  
Thursday, 16 November 2006
BERKELEY, CA (UroToday.com) - This is an important manuscript that documents the incidence of postoperative bleeding (overall 0.4%) with upper retroperitoneal laparoscopic surgery (nephrectomy = 3.3%, adrenalectomy = 5.4%, and partial nephrectomy = 9.9%).

Risk factors included patient age and ASA classification; surgeon experience, standard vs. hand-assist approach, gender, body mass index, and prior surgery did not correlate with an increased risk of hemorrhage. Over half of these patients (56%), required only a 1-2 unit transfusion; almost all of the remainder received anywhere from 3- 6 units. There were two patients who required 11 and 12 units; one had portal hypertension and was converted to an open procedure and the other was on chronic anticoagulation therapy and bled at postoperative day 4 after restarting coumadin; this individual was readmitted with a PTT > 100 seconds. Of note, only 12% (0.4% overall) required surgical management and among these 4 patients, one would not be explored today (venous oozing) and one was for a late splenic bleed. The average hospital stay was increased by 4 days among the patients with postoperative hemorrhage. A similar report on hemorrhage after upper retroperitoneal laparoscopy was recently published by Bhayani, Kavoussi, and colleagues; however, in this article twice as many patients (0.8%) underwent exploration for postoperative hemorrhage.1 While in the Bhayani study, early exploration (0.4%) was justified by the operative findings (i.e. all due to arterial bleeding) in those with an acute problem (i.e. hypotension, greater than 10 unit drop in hematocrit from the initial postoperative hematocrit), such was not the case for patients with a more gradual decrease in the hematocrit (i.e. 5 point drop and > 5 unit transfusion over 24-36 hrs.). Among the latter patients undergoing exploration for a gradual fall in hematocrit, only a "diffuse oozing" was found at surgery; among these patients the hospital stay was prolonged to 12 days. Perhaps even a more conservative algorithm, as championed in the present article, should be considered in patients with a gradual hemorrhage picture.

1 Bhayani, S. B., Link, R. E., Makarov, D. V., et al.

H. M. Rosevear, J. S. Montgomery, W. W. Roberts, and J. S. Wolf, Jr.

J. Urol. 176: 1458-1462, October 2006

Written by Ralph V. Clayman, MD, a Contributing Editor with UroToday.

Reader Comments

Please log-in or register in order to submit comments.

Powered by AkoComment!

 
User Rating: / 0
PoorBest


 
< Prev   Next >