Home
September 2008 October 2008 November 2008
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
Week 40 1 2 3 4
Week 41 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Week 42 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
Week 43 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Week 44 26 27 28 29 30 31

European Urology - Italian Validation of the Urogenital Distress Inventory and Its Application in LUTS Patients Show Comments PDF Print E-mail
  
Wednesday, 20 December 2006
Volume 50, Issue 6, Pages 1323-1329 (December 2006)

Abstract -

Objectives:

The objective of this study was to validate the Italian version of the Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI) in a sample of women with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS).

Methods

The linguistic validation of the questionnaire was performed through a multistep process: backward and forward translations coordinated by clinical investigators, followed by a pretest. The final version was administered to a larger sample of female patients, aged 18 years or older who had been having LUTS for at least 3 months, numbering 53 subjects. To evaluate test-retest reliability, patients were re-rated after 1 week. To test the questionnaire's capacity to discriminate women with or without LUTS (cases and controls, respectively), a sample of 53 healthy women was enrolled. A 72-h voiding diary was used as a gold standard and compared with the UDI.

Results

The correlation coefficient between ratings was ≥0.80, and the discriminant power between cases and controls was confirmed. The UDI showed good internal consistency for all domains, except irritative symptoms (total score's Cronbach alpha=0.86). Factor analytic structure revealed urinary incontinence to be opposite to the other urologic symptoms, with bed wetting being loaded separately. The average daily number of urgent micturitions was higher in patients who reported they “experience a strong feeling of urgency to empty bladder” in the UDI than those ones who did not (p<0.01).

Conclusions

The Italian version of the UDI is a valid and robust instrument, which can now be used reliably in daily practice and clinical research.

Walter Artibania, Francesco Pesceb, Domenico Preziosoc, Roberto M. Scarpade, Filiberto Zattonif, Andrea Tubarog, Carlo A. Rizzih, Ambra M. Santinih, Lucia Simonii

a University of Padua, Padua, Italy
b Azienda CPO, Ostia, Rome, Italy
c Federico II University, Naples, Italy
d San Luigi Hospital, Clinica Urologica, Università di Torino, Turin, Italy
e SS Trinità Hospital, Università di Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
f Policlinico GB Rossi, Verona, Italy
g Sant’Andrea Hospital, Rome, Italy
h Boehringer-Ingelheim, Milan, Italy
i Medidata, Modena, Italy

Accepted 18 April 2006 published online 5 May 2006.

Reader Comments

Please log-in or register in order to submit comments.

Powered by AkoComment!

 
User Rating: / 0
PoorBest


 
< Prev   Next >