Home
January 2010 February 2010 March 2010
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
Week 5 1 2 3 4 5 6
Week 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
Week 7 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Week 8 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
Week 9 28
Reach urologists

Topical triamcinolone for persistent phimosis - Abstract Show Comments PDF Print E-mail
  
Wednesday, 04 November 2009

Department of Surgery, Division of Pediatric Urology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine, Université de Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

Between 2% and 5% of uncircumcised boys have persistent or pathological phimosis. Traditional treatment is usually circumcision. Recently medical treatment with topical corticosteroids has become more popular. We evaluated the efficacy of the topical steroid triamcinolone compared to foreskin retraction with an emollient cream and verified the long-term success rate of these treatments.

We performed a double-blind, randomized, placebo controlled study to compare 2-month twice daily treatment with emollient cream (placebo group 1) vs 0.1% triamcinolone (experimental group 2). Boys between ages 3 and 12 years with persistent or pathological phimosis were included in analysis. Study EXCLUSION criteria were previous treatment with topical corticosteroid, untreated balanitis and any known medical condition with immune system impairment. Patients were seen 2, 4 and 12 months after treatment initiation. Success was defined as complete, easy foreskin retraction at 4 and 12 months. Statistical analysis was done using Fisher's exact test.

We enrolled 63 patients, of whom 43 completed the study. Despite multiple attempts 20 patients had incomplete followup and were excluded from study. Placebo group 1 included 25 patients and triamcinolone group 2 included 21. In group 1 the success rate was significantly lower than in group 2 (9 patients or 39% vs 16 or 76%, p = 0.0086). At 2 months 5 and 16 nonresponders in groups 2 and 1, respectively, were treated in nonblinded fashion with topical triamcinolone. In this subgroup 1 of 3 group 2 patients and 6 of 13 in group 1 achieved complete, easy retraction. Two and 1 patients were lost to followup in groups 1 and 2, respectively. Circumcision was required in only 5 patients (11.6%), including 4 (17.4%) initially in group 1. No complications were noted in either group.

Triamcinolone is a highly effective and safe short-term treatment for persistent physiological or pathological phimosis. However, at long-term followup recurrence is frequent and not rare with triamcinolone and it may require re-treatment or circumcision.

Written by:
Letendre J, Barrieras D, Franc-Guimond J, Abdo A, Houle AM.   Are you the author?

Reference:
J Urol. 2009 Oct;182(4 Suppl):1759-63.
doi:10.1016/j.juro.2009.03.016

PubMed Abstract
PMID:19692044

UroToday.com Pediatric Urology Section

Reader Comments
Treating a problem that doesn't exist
Written by This email address is being protected from spam bots, you need Javascript enabled to view it on 2009-11-25 11:02:39
"Boys between ages 3 and 12 years with persistent or pathological phimosis were included in analysis." 
 
Fortunately, these researchers were nowhere near me around that age, or else they'd probably have diagnosed me with phimosis too. I wasn't retractable until I was about ten, but it was never an issue, and I have a fully-functioning intact penis 33 years later. Neither my parents nor any doctors were interested in whether or not I could retract. It just doesn't seem to be an issue outside North America. 
 
How are these researchers actually diagnosing phimosis without breeching AAP guidelines?: 
 
 
"Foreskin retraction should never be forced. Until the foreskin fully separates, do not try to pull it back. Forcing the foreskin to retract before it is ready can cause severe pain, bleeding, and tears in the skin."
Phimosis cannot be diagnosed before pube
Written by This email address is being protected from spam bots, you need Javascript enabled to view it on 2009-11-05 11:05:20
This is a rather shocking article. According to Oster (1968) and Kayaba (1996) as well as numerous other articles, pathological phimosis cannot be truly diagnosed until late puberty. Indeed it is not until 10.5 years that 50% of boys have a fully retractable foreskin. See www.cirp.org/library/normal. So it should be no surprise that the treatment is often only temporarily effective in boys from 3 to 12. Why all this worry about early retractability? Phimosis is only a worry if the urine stream is truly blocked or if the young man reaches early adulthood without full retractability. Even then some may take into their 20s to fully develop.

Please log-in or register in order to submit comments.

Powered by AkoComment!

 
User Rating: / 8
PoorBest


 
Visitor Ratings:
Healthcare Professionals:
2 (1 votes)

Patients:
2 (7 votes)

No Affiliation:
4 (6 votes)


Bookmark and Share

Member's Section

Login

Sign Up

Quick Search

Featured Conference

Media and Publisher

Advertising Rates

Working with Industry

Case Studies
Sponsorship Opportunities

Pediatric Urology
Sponsored By