Home
October 2009 November 2009 December 2009
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
Week 45 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Week 46 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Week 47 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
Week 48 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Week 49 29 30
Reach urologists

Sex Assignment for Newborns with Ambiguous Genitalia and Exposure to Fetal Testosterone: Attitudes and Practices of Pediatric Urologists Show Comments PDF Print E-mail
  
Monday, 17 July 2006
BERKELEY, CA (UroToday.com) - The major controversy surrounding ambiguous genitalia remains the role of sex assignment to newborns with this entity. This study by Diamond et al compiled the views and practices of pediatric urologists regarding sex assignment. A survey was mailed to the fellows in the Urology Section of the American Academy of Pediatrics. The survey was completed by 185/228 (81%) of the members. The survey encompassed to two cases: 1) masculinized 46XX congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH); and 2) 46XY cloacal exstrophy. Questions asked were in reference to sex assignment, timing of surgery, decision-making process, and the respondent's demographics.

For masculinized 46XX CAH, virtually all respondents favored female sex assignment. The most important factor was potential fertility. For 46XY cloacal exstrophy, two thirds favored the male sex. The most important factor was potential androgen brain imprinting, whereas in selecting female assignment, it was difficulty creating a functional phallus. Respondent characteristics associated with assigning female sex were longer duration in practice (>15 years) and affiliation with training programs. Most respondents advocated a team approach to decision making with parental involvement and early surgery (<18 months).

From this paper, the group concluded that pediatric urologists are in strong consensus about sex assignment for newborns with ambiguous genitalia from CAH. It is prudent that there be a team approach with parental involvement, and early reconstruction. The consensus was positive for female rearing. In regards to cloacal exstrophy, there was a remarkable difference in sex assignment centering on the reconstruction and functionality of the penis with cautions of imprinting. Overall, one can only stress that the true approach is via a knowledgeable team effort including the parents. Unfortunately, this decision should include the patient but it is not practical. Socially it is difficult, and almost impossible, to assign a "third sex".

The Journal of Pediatrics 148(4):445-449, April 2006

Written by Pasquale Casale, MD, a Contributing Editor with UroToday.

Reader Comments

Please log-in or register in order to submit comments.

Powered by AkoComment!

 
User Rating: / 0
PoorBest


 

Bookmark and Share
< Prev   Next >

Member's Section

Login

Sign Up

Quick Search

Featured Conference

Media and Publisher

Advertising Rates
Reprints

Working with Industry

Case Studies
Sponsorship Opportunities

Pediatric Urology
Sponsored By