Home
October 2009 November 2009 December 2009
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
Week 45 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Week 46 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Week 47 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
Week 48 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Week 49 29 30

Pediatric Shockwave Lithotripsy, Size Matters! Show Comments PDF Print E-mail
  
Friday, 20 April 2007

BERKELEY, CA (UroToday.com) - A recent review of the literature shows that shockwave lithotripsy is an efficacious modality for pediatric urolithiasis when intervention is required.

The literature also shows that good results are obtained even with large stone burdens, irrespective of stone location. Wadhwa, et al reviewed the outcomes of shockwave lithotripsy in the pediatric population in their center in New Delhi, India. They assessed the impact of stone burden and location, as well as the age of the child on the stone free rates.

They reviewed 106 patients who were less than 16 years of age treated with shockwave lithotripsy for stones with a surface area of 20-600 mm2 between July 1989 and June 2004. Metabolic abnormalities were present in 20.7% of the patients. All the procedures were performed using the Siemens Lithostar and the stone clearance was assessed 3 months after shockwave lithotripsy. Complications and the need for subsequent treatment and ancillary procedures were noted. The impacts of stone size and location as well as the age of the child were assessed regarding stone clearance.

The group found that the overall stone-free rate was 87% with a complete clearance of 72% and what they called an insignificant less than 3-mm residual fragments of 15%. The re-treatment rate was 58%. The efficiency quotient was 47. They also found that stone size correlated with a stone free rate while patient age and stone location did not have a significant impact.

The group concluded that shockwave lithotripsy is an effective modality to treat pediatric upper urinary tract calculi, especially when the stone burden is less than 200 mm2. Larger stone burdens are associated with a poorer clearance and required subsequent procedures. They also found hat the larger stone burdens had a higher complication rate. If shockwave lithotripsy is going to be used as a modality in stone treatment, it is our responsibility as the surgeons to follow these children long term to ensure that not only is it an efficacious modality but safe with no long term morbidity to the patients.

Pankaj Wadhwa, Monish Aron, Amlesh Seth, Prem N. Dogra, Ashok K. Hemal, Narmada P. Gupta.

Journal of Endourology 21(2): 141-144, February 2007

UroToday.com Pediatric Urology Section

Written by Pasquale Casale, MD, a Contributing Editor with UroToday.

Reader Comments
Dr
Written by This email address is being protected from spam bots, you need Javascript enabled to view it on 2007-04-21 02:09:41
It is interesting to know if these children developed diabetes or hypertention in the future, following ESWL. It is also interesting to know if different generations of lithotriptors would impact differently on chilren. Were these children part of the decision to use ESWL on them, or it was just parental consent. Does the manufacturer recommend therapy for the chosen age group using the lithotriptor? Dr Akis Afoko

Please log-in or register in order to submit comments.

Powered by AkoComment!

 
User Rating: / 0
PoorBest


 

Bookmark and Share
< Prev   Next >

Member's Section

Login

Sign Up

Quick Search

Featured Conference

Media and Publisher

Advertising Rates
Reprints

Working with Industry

Case Studies
Sponsorship Opportunities

Pediatric Urology
Sponsored By