Home
October 2009 November 2009 December 2009
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
Week 45 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Week 46 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Week 47 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
Week 48 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Week 49 29 30
Reach urologists

Magnetic Resonance Arteriography/Venography is Not Accurate to Structure Management of the Impalpable Testis - Abstract Show Comments PDF Print E-mail
  
Monday, 08 September 2008

Division of Pediatric Urology, Children's Memorial Hospital and Department of Medical Imaging, Children's Memorial Hospital and Department of Urology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.

Departments of Urology and Pediatrics, University of Toledo College of Medicine, Toledo, Ohio.

Recent studies have shown that magnetic resonance arteriography/venography is a highly sensitive tool to identify impalpable testes in young boys. Due to this and the low risk of cancer in testicular nubbins observation has been proposed after the identification of nubbins by magnetic resonance arteriography/venography. We prospectively examined the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance imaging with magnetic resonance arteriography/venography for identifying impalpable testes in a younger cohort of patients typically seen at a pediatric institution in the United States.

We prospectively studied 26 infants and boys with impalpable testes. Conventional magnetic resonance imaging or magnetic resonance imaging with magnetic resonance arteriography/venography was performed in all patients. All patients subsequently underwent surgical exploration. Surgical and radiological findings were then evaluated for concordance.

A total of 26 boys (29 impalpable testes) with a median age of 13 months were evaluated. A subset of 14 boys (14 impalpable testes) also underwent magnetic resonance arteriography/venography. Standard magnetic resonance imaging correctly identified 10 of 12 intra-abdominal testes, 4 of 6 intracanalicular testes, 4 of 10 testicular nubbins and 0 of 1 scrotal testis. Magnetic resonance arteriography/venography correctly identified 4 of 5 intra-abdominal testes, 2 of 3 intracanalicular testes, 2 of 5 testicular nubbins and 0 of 1 scrotal testis. The overall accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging alone and magnetic resonance arteriography/venography for identifying a viable testis or testicular nubbin was 62% and 57%, respectively. The accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance arteriography/venography for identifying a viable testis was 74% and 67%, respectively.

Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging or magnetic resonance arteriography/venography does not accurately identify or localize impalpable testes in the age group typically presenting to pediatric urologists. Accuracy at our institution is discrepant with that in previous studies. We do not recommend using magnetic resonance imaging or magnetic resonance arteriography/venography for the possible observation of vanishing testes or nubbins and we recommend surgical exploration in all individuals.

Written by:
Desireddi NV, Liu DB, Maizels M, Rigsby C, Casey JT, Cheng EY.   Are you the author?

Reference:
J Urol. 2008 Aug 20. Epub ahead of print.
doi:10.1016/j.juro.2008.04.075

PubMed Abstract
PMID:18721972

 

UroToday.com Pediatric Urology Section

 

Reader Comments

Please log-in or register in order to submit comments.

Powered by AkoComment!

 
User Rating: / 0
PoorBest


 

Bookmark and Share
< Prev   Next >

Member's Section

Login

Sign Up

Quick Search

Featured Conference

Media and Publisher

Advertising Rates
Reprints

Working with Industry

Case Studies
Sponsorship Opportunities

Pediatric Urology
Sponsored By