Home
July 2008 August 2008 September 2008
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
Week 31 1 2
Week 32 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Week 33 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Week 34 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
Week 35 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
Week 36 31

BJUI Mini Reviews - Non-Surgical Management of Multicystic Dysplastic Kidney Show Comments PDF Print E-mail
  
Friday, 11 April 2008
(BJUI Mini Reviews) - Objective: To better define the outcome and association of multicystic dysplastic kidney (MCDK) with hypertension, vesico-ureteric reflux (VUR), infection and cancer, as there is no consensus on the management of patients born with MCDK.


2008 BJU INTERNATIONAL | 101, 804–808 | doi:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.07328.x 
Non-surgical management of multicystic 
dysplastic kidney 
Angelo J. Cambio, Christopher P. Evans and Eric A. Kurzrock 
Department of Urology, University of California, Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, CA, USA 
Accepted for publication 7 September 2007 
RESULTS 
The inclusion criteria were met by 105 
reports that were subsequently analysed. 
Of MCDK, 60% regress or involute within 
3 years. About 25% of patients will have 
VUR into the contralateral kidney, of 
which 90% is grade 
≤ 
3. The risk of 
urinary tract infection appears to be 
associated with VUR or coexistent 
abnormalities rather than the MCDK. 
The risk of hypertension is no greater 
than that in the general population and 
nephrectomy is usually not curative. 
The overall risk of Wilms’ tumour 
developing in a MCDK is 
< 
1 in 2000. All 
reported Wilms’ tumours were identified 
before 4 years of age and 70% presented 
as a palpable mass. 
CONCLUSIONS 
Published reports support the non-surgical 
management of MCDK. Common practice has 
been to remove palpable or growing MCDKs, 
although these represent a very small fraction 
of MCDKs. In theory, ultrasonographic 
surveillance until 4 years old might allow the 
earlier detection of a Wilms’ tumour, and 
decrease the intensity of chemotherapy and 
improve prognosis. Previous reports do not 
prove or disprove this concept, and the 
appropriate frequency of surveillance is not 
evident. 
KEYWORDS 
multicystic dysplastic kidney, Wilms’ tumour, 
renal cell carcinoma, vesico-ureteric reflux 
OBJECTIVES 
To better define the outcome and association 
of multicystic dysplastic kidney (MCDK) with 
hypertension, vesico-ureteric reflux (VUR), 
infection and cancer, as there is no consensus 
on the management of patients born with 
MCDK. The risk of cancer has dictated the 
surgical management of the disease in 
the past. 
METHODS 
The Medline database was searched for 
articles published between 1965 and 2006 
and written in the English language, and 
containing the keywords ‘multicystic 
dysplastic kidney’. 
INTRODUCTION 
The incidence of multicystic dysplastic kidney 
(MCDK) is not well defined; it is reported to 
occur unilaterally in one in 2400, one in 4100 
or one in 4300 live births, and is the most 
common form of cystic kidney in children 
[1,2]. The condition occurs more commonly in 
males than females (2.4:1) but females are 
twice as likely to have bilateral MCDK. The left 
The incidence of multicystic dysplastic kidney 
(MCDK) is not well defined; it is reported to 
occur unilaterally in one in 2400, one in 4100 
or one in 4300 live births, and is the most 
common form of cystic kidney in children 
[1,2]. The condition occurs more commonly in 
males than females (2.4:1) but females are 
twice as likely to have bilateral MCDK. The left 
kidney is more often affected than the right. 
MCDK has two subtypes that are based 
on gross appearance, i.e. solid cystic 
dysplasia and hydronephrotic form. The 
former is characterized by increased 
stromal components and smaller 
cysts; the hydronephrotic form of MCDK is 
characterized by an identifiable renal pelvis. 
Differentiating MCDK from Wilms’ tumour or 
RCC with cystic components is a challenge 
and a potential source of error in reporting 
neoplasia associated with MCDK [3]. 
Recent reports support non-surgical 
management, with long-term follow-up 
[1,4], and there is no strong evidence 
supporting any particular follow-up regimen. 
Current non-surgical management protocols 
might include renal ultrasonography (US), 
growth-chart analysis, urine analysis, blood 
tests and blood pressure assessment, all of 
which are at variable and arbitrary intervals. 
The morbidity and cost of surgery have 
been compared to the morbidity, cost, 
inconvenience and bother of an extended 
follow-up; however, no universally accepted 
management protocol has emerged. After a 
thorough review of published reports in the 
English language, our goal was to present a 
concise statement on the risks and discuss 
management options. 
METHODS 
The Medline database was searched for 
articles published between 1965 and 2006 in 
the English language and containing the 
keywords ‘multicystic dysplastic kidney’. Case 
reports were excluded unless they involved 
cancer. The abstracts of 152 articles were 
analysed and of these, 105 reports were 
reviewed. If an article cited relevant 
original work in report before 1965, 
these were also analysed. We specifically 
assessed the relationship of MCDK with VUR, 
UTI, hypertension, cancer and the need for 
surgery. 
RESULTS 
DIAGNOSIS 
Previous reports show that historically MCDK 
was a rare finding that was diagnosed by a 
palpable abdominal mass and managed 
with nephrectomy [5]. The widespread 
use of antenatal US has led to an increasing 
incidence of MCDK [6,7]. Antenatal US has a 
sensitivity of 80–100% with a false-positive 
rate of 
≈ 
2%, the main differential diagnosis 
being a poorly functioning hydronephrotic 
kidney [8,9]. 
Abnormal postnatal US verifies the suspicious 
finding (Fig. 1). A renal isotope scan is useful 
 
NON-SURGICAL MANAGEMENT OF MULTICYSTIC DYSPLASTIC KIDNEY 
 
© 
 
 
 
2008 THE AUTHORS 
JOURNAL COMPILATION 
 
© 
 
 2008 BJU INTERNATIONAL 
 
805 
 
when the MCDK is not easily distinguished 
from a hydronephrotic kidney. A renal 
concentration of isotope is indicative of 
hydronephrosis, as renal function in MCDK is 
exceedingly rare. If necessary, a DMSA scan is 
appropriate as a diuretic/excretory evaluation 
is unnecessary. 
VUR 
Numerous articles included voiding cysto- 
urethrography (VCUG) in the evaluation of 
MCDK. VUR was reported to occur into the 
contralateral kidney in 15–28% of patients 
[10–14]. Miller 
 
et al. 
 
 [12] retrospectively 
investigated the fate of the refluxing 
contralateral kidney in 75 children with 
MCDK; VUR was diagnosed in 25% of 
patients, with grade distributed as 5% for I, 
42% for II, 42% for III, 11% for IV and none of 
grade V. There was spontaneous resolution 
within 5 years in most (89%) of the patients 
with grade I and II VUR, and half of patients 
with grades III or IV VUR. Of children in this 
series, 19% had a documented UTI at some 
point during the follow-up (median 
53 months). The presence of VUR did not 
correlate with the growth of the normal 
kidney in a child on antimicrobial prophylaxis. 
In 2005, Ismaili 
 
et al. 
 
 [11] challenged the 
routine use of VCUG to detect contralateral 
VUR in patients with a MCDK. In a 
retrospective analysis they reported that two 
successive normal neonatal renal US might 
exclude significant contralateral anomalies, 
thus avoiding VCUG and its associated 
radiation exposure and pain. The sensitivity, 
specificity, positive and negative predictive 
value of two successive neonatal 
ultrasonograms to detect VUR was 75%, 95%, 
80% and 93%, respectively. All patients with 
high-grade VUR were detected by US. Ismaili 
 
et al. 
 
 recommended that VCUG not be used 
in those patients who have two normal 
contralateral postnatal renal ultrasonograms. 
The rate of UTI, with or without antibiotics, 
was not reported, and is a major limitation of 
the study. 
INVOLUTION 
The fate of the affected kidney is variable; 
affected kidneys involute or decrease in size 
in 60–89% of cases, some stay the same 
(2–37%) and few increase in size (0–18%) 
[13,15,16]. The timeline to involution is 
variable; the mean time was reported as 
20 months in one study [13] and 122 months 
in another [16]. Statistically derived estimates 
show that 20% and 50% of MCDKs will 
become undetectable by US (involution) at 3 
and 5 years of follow-up, respectively [17]. 
HYPERTENSION 
Hypertension associated with MCDK has been 
anecdotally reported; the true incidence is 
unknown, but thought to be extremely low. In 
a systematic review of 29 studies, including 
1115 patients, Narchi [18] recently reported 
the incidence of hypertension associated with 
MCDK as 5.4 per 1000 patients. Surprisingly, 
this is lower than the incidence of 
hypertension in the general paediatric 
population. However, Narchi caution that 
their comparison of series was hampered by 
disparities in patient age, follow-up and 
criteria for defining hypertension. In another 
large study, Wacksman and Phipps [19] found 
no cases of hypertension in a series of 441 
cases reported to the Multicystic Kidney 
Registry. Hypertension in a patient with MCDK 
might be an indication for nephrectomy, but 
in about two-thirds of cases the hypertension 
will persist after nephrectomy [20]. 
WILMS’ TUMOUR (WT) 
There were reports on the association of WT 
with MCDK, primarily based on case studies 
and small series (Table 1 [21–28]). Evidence 
supporting these case reports is often 
incomplete and not supported by outside 
pathological review [3]. Despite the nature of 
this evidence, the purported increased risk of 
cancer continues to dictate the management 
of MCDK for many urologists. Many patients 
have had and continue to have nephrectomies 
[29]. 
In response to this issue, Beckwith [3] 
calculated the risk of WT in MCDK, based on 
work by Gordon 
 
et al. 
 
 [2], in which 10 
unilateral cases of MCDK were detected in 
43 175 live births, thereby estimating an 
incidence of 1 in 4300 live births. The National 
Wilms’ Tumor Study Pathology Center 
provided data on 7500 WTs collected over 
26 years; only five of the 7500 WTs occurred 
in a MCDK. The risk of WT in the general 
population is 1 in 8000–10 000. Taking into 
account the risk of MCDK during the same 
26-year period, the calculated risk of WT in 
association with MCDK is 1 in 2000. With a 
90% cure rate for WT, Beckwith concluded 
that nephrectomy and routine monitoring are 
not justified [3]. 
Surprisingly, through a completely different 
approach, Noe 
 
et al. 
 
 [30] had previously 
calculated that 2000 nephrectomies would be 
necessary to prevent one WT. Nephrogenic 
rests are a precursor to WT and the incidence 
is 
 
≈ 
 
1% in the general population, or 
 
≈ 
 
100 
times the incidence of WT. The incidence of 
nephrogenic rests in those with WT is higher, 
at 12–40% [31], and in those with MCDK is 
reported to be to 3–5% [31]. Assuming 1% of 
cases of nephrogenic rests degenerate to WT 
[31] and there is a 5% increased risk of 
nephrogenic rests with MCDK, 2000 
nephrectomies would be needed to prevent 
one WT [30]. The calculation by Noe 
 
et al. 
 
 
supports the estimate generated by 
Beckwith [3]. 
In the Preliminary Report of the Multicystic 
Kidney Registry, Wacksman and Phipps [19] 
report only two cases of WT in the 25 years 
before their 1993 publication. A 10-month- 
old and 4-year-old both presented with a 
palpable mass. Of the 260 cases of MCDK in 
the registry that were managed without 
surgery, there were no cases of WT. The 
Multicystic Kidney Registry stopped enrolling 
patients in the late 1990s, but only one 
patient in 
 
≈ 
 
900 cases registered developed a 
malignancy, and this malignancy did not 
develop in a true MCDK (J Wacksman, 
personal communication 2006). Wacksman 
and Phipps [19] estimate that 8000 MCDKs 
would have to be removed to prevent one 
tumour. 
In a systematic review of 26 studies including 
1041 patients, Narchi [32] reported that there 
were no WTs in patients with MCDK. While 
the results from this systematic review 
are promising, the author noted that the 
study was limited by heterogeneity of the 
populations, an 18-year span of studies and 
availability/accuracy of antenatal US, the 
varied duration of follow-up and varied 
 
FIG. 1. 
 
An ultrasonogram of a MCDK.
 
CAMBIO 
 
ET AL. 
 
© 
 
 
 
2008 THE AUTHORS 
 
806 
 
JOURNAL COMPILATION 
 
© 
 
 2008 BJU INTERNATIONAL 
 
frequency of US surveillance. Nevertheless, 
there is no large review or meta-analysis 
reporting an association of MCDK with WT. 
In our review of 10 reported cases of WT 
associated with a purported MCDK (Table 1), 
seven presented with a palpable abdominal 
mass. No patient with documented WT 
presented after 4 years of age; only four had a 
known history of MCDK, and none presented 
with metastatic disease. Survival data were 
available for eight of the 10 cases. The follow- 
up ranged from 7 months to 12 years and no 
recurrences or deaths were reported. There 
were no reports of WT associated with an 
involuted kidney. 
RCC 
We found six reports of RCC associated with 
MCDK in patients aged 15–44 years; all cases 
were of advanced stage with large tumours. 
The accuracy of the pathological diagnosis of 
MCDK with these large tumours is debatable. 
None were subject to outside pathological 
review, as with WT. None of the patients had a 
pre-existing history of MCDK. As such, it is 
possible that some of these were cystic RCCs. 
 
DISCUSSION 
 
Before antenatal US was routinely used 
most identified MCDKs were large and 
palpable. This abnormal finding on physical 
examination led to the preferred treatment of 
nephrectomy. In the era of antenatal US the 
prevalence of MCDK has increased and the 
size of affected kidneys has decreased [5]. 
High rates of spontaneous partial or complete 
involution [1,13,15–17] and low rates of 
hypertension [18] and neoplasia [32] have 
shifted the management to a non-surgical 
approach. 
There is little controversy about the diagnostic 
evaluation of MCDK. The argument for 
VCUG in patients with MCDK parallels the 
controversy and rhetoric about infants with 
pre- and postnatal mild hydronephrosis; VUR 
is found in 15–40% of these infants [33]. 
Evidence suggests that the finding of low- 
grade VUR might not be clinically important 
[33]. Unlike infants with prenatal 
hydronephrosis, children with MCKD have 
half the renal reserve. The recognition of 
reflux and prevention of pyelonephritis in 
children with a solitary functioning kidney is 
important. Cystography is still practised 
routinely, as reported in the vast majority of 
published series. 
Some authors include urine culture and blood 
pressure assessment as components of the 
follow-up for MCDK. Urine culture in children 
carries an inherent rate of false-positive 
results. The preliminary report of the 
Multicystic Registry reported only 12 cases of 
UTI in the 260 cases that were managed 
without surgery [19]. Similar to the 
management of VUR, routine urine culture in 
asymptomatic children is hampered by a 
significant false-positive rate, which negates 
its value. Paediatricians recommend blood 
pressure monitoring in all children during 
clinical encounters after the age of 3 years. 
Children aged 
 
< 
 
3 years should have their 
blood pressure measured under special 
circumstances, such as MCDK [34]. 
Complete involution, meaning that the MCDK 
has become imperceptible to US, is a 
satisfying outcome. However, the malignant 
potential of even small amounts of residual 
tissue is uncertain. In our review we were 
unable to find one case of WT associated with 
an involuted MCDK. All cases of WT presented 
before 4 years old and at least seven of the 10 
were palpable. These are new findings from 
our review. No deaths from WT were reported. 
Two investigators, with different methods, 
have calculated the risk of developing a WT to 
be 1 in 2000 for children with MCDK (the risk 
in the general paediatric population is 1 in 
8–10 000). 
An estimated 36 000 new cases of RCC were 
diagnosed in the USA in 2005. Considering 
the higher incidence of RCC in men and the 
higher incidence of MCDK in newborn boys, 
there should be 
 
≈ 
 
10 random associations of 
RCC with MCDK per year. As there are only six 
reported in the English language, MCDK 
 
TABLE 1 
 
Case reports of Wilms’ tumour associated with MCDK 
 
Reference 
Age*, 
months/sex Presentation Outcome 
[21] 18/M Prenatal US showing renal cysts; L flank mass on physical exam; confirmed by 
postnatal US; 14 months persistent cystic disease with no evidence of tumour; 
4 months later parent noticed increasing abdominal girth; 16 
 
× 
 
10 
 
× 
 
13 cm solid 
tumour with calcifications; L total nephrectomy; favourable histology WT with 
invasion into perirenal fat 
Chemo for 6 months NED 13 month f/u 
[22] 11/M Prenatal diagnosis MCDK, lost to f/u, 11 months presented with abdominal mass Positive response to chemo f/u NR 
[23] 5/F Prenatal diagnosis of MCDK, abdominal swelling NED 6 year f/u 
3/F L flank mass on US Chemo; NED 8 year f/u 
[24] 17/M MCDK discovered on MRI when evaluating anorectal malformation NR 
[25] 5/NR Nephrectomy for abnormal sonogram NED, 1 year f/u 
[26] 48/F Palpable abdominal mass NR 
[27] 10/M Palpable abdominal mass NED, 11 year f/u 
[28] 9/F Palpable abdominal mass NED, 5 year f/u 
1/M Palpable abdominal mass NED, 5 month f/u 
 
f/u, follow-up; L, left, NED, no evidence of disease; NR, not reported; chemo, chemotherapy. *Age at diagnosis of growing abdominal mass that prompted surgical 
intervention.
 
NON-SURGICAL MANAGEMENT OF MULTICYSTIC DYSPLASTIC KIDNEY 
 
© 
 
 
 
2008 THE AUTHORS 
JOURNAL COMPILATION 
 
© 
 
 2008 BJU INTERNATIONAL 
 
807 
 
might carry an equal or lesser risk of 
developing RCC than a normal kidney. 
In urological reports, proponents of surgery 
argue that non-surgical management 
requires a long-term follow-up with frequent, 
costly US, leaving patients at risk of infection, 
hypertension and cancer, especially in those 
cases lost to follow-up. A few studies showed 
that early nephrectomy is more cost-effective 
than non-surgical follow-up. These types 
of analyses are arbitrary, as the necessary 
frequency of US surveillance is unknown 
and costs are highly variable among health 
systems. This surgical bias is absent in the 
nephrological literature. 
There are various and similar surveillance 
regimens used for MCDK. Generally, these 
include renal US every 3–6 months for the 
first year, every 6 months in the second year 
and then annually thereafter. The main 
indication for frequent surveillance is to 
detect WT. The prognosis after treating WT 
depends on the stage and histology at surgery. 
Children with lower stage disease (I, II) have an 
excellent 4-year recurrence-free survival 
( 
 
≈ 
 
95%) compared to higher-stage disease (III, 
IV; 
 
≈ 
 
85%) for both the National WT Study 
Group and the Société Internationale 
d’Oncologie Pédiatrique protocols. More 
important than stage is tumour histology; 
children with stage I and unfavourable 
histology (anaplasia) have a significantly 
lower overall survival (83%) than children 
with stage I and favourable histology (98%). 
Although time and growth will inevitably 
increase the stage, there is no evidence that 
time does or does not affect histology. 
There are disorders that have a well 
documented association with WT, i.e. 
Beckwith–Wiedmann syndrome (BWS) and 
idiopathic hemihypertrophy (IHH). As WTs 
grow so rapidly, experience with screening 
children with BWS/IHH has shown that US is 
needed every 3–4 months to effectively lower 
the tumour stage [35,36]. Notably, in the 
screened population, 20% of children had 
false-positive results and thus had surgery for 
benign lesions. Frequent surveillance is not 
recommended after 6 years of age in the 
BWS/IHH population. The incidence of WT in 
these patients ( 
 
≈ 
 
5%) is 100 times higher than 
the theoretical incidence (0.05%) of WT in 
patients with MCDK. 
How does the risk of WT compare with other 
childhood malignancies? The incidence of 
WT, brain cancer and leukaemia per million 
children per year is 8, 33 and 44, respectively; 
the last two cancers are significantly more 
deadly. Unfortunately, there is no economic, 
noninvasive manner to screen all children for 
these grave cancers. As the incidence of 
MCDK is only 1 in 4000, there is a small at-risk 
population who can be screened. Fortunately, 
US is relatively inexpensive and not invasive. 
Beyond cancer screening, surveillance of 
these kidneys is advantageous as some will 
grow. What has not been answered is the 
appropriate frequency of surveillance. If the 
goal is to down-stage a WT, a 4-month 
frequency until age 4 years would be 
necessary. 
In conclusion, the incidence of MCDK is 
 
≈ 
 
1 in 
4000 live births, of which 60% will regress or 
involute within 3 years. Up to a third of 
patients will have VUR into the contralateral 
kidney, of which 90% is grade I–III. The risk of 
UTI appears to be associated with VUR or 
coexistent urological abnormalities rather 
than the MCDK. The risk of hypertension is no 
greater than that in the general population 
and nephrectomy is usually not curative. The 
overall risk of WT developing in a MCDK is 
 
< 
 
1 
in 2000. All reported WTs were identified 
before 4 years of age and seven of 10 
presented as a palpable mass. There is no 
reported case of WT in association with an 
involuted MCDK. As such, the risk of WT 
developing in an MCDK which is regressing 
or involuted is substantially 
 
< 
 
1 in 2000, 
and is probably less than the risk of 
neoplasia in a normal size kidney. There 
is no evidence to support an increased risk 
of RCC with MCDK. 
Previous reports support the non-surgical 
management of MCDK. Although not 
supported by firm published evidence, the 
common practice has been to remove 
palpable or growing MCDKs; however, such 
cases are rare. The increased risk of WT 
supports surveillance with US up to 4 years 
old, but there is no evidence to guide the 
appropriate frequency of renal imaging. 
 
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 
 
We appreciate the input and review 
of this manuscript before submission by 
J. Bruce Beckwith, MD. Angelo Cambio, 
MD, was supported by the Aventis 
Clinical Research Fellowship in Urologic 
Oncology. 
 
CONFLICT OF INTEREST 
 
None declared. 
 
REFERENCES 
 
1 
 
Kuwertz-Broeking E, Brinkmann OA, 
Von Lengerke HJ 
 
et al. 
 
 Unilateral 
multicystic dysplastic kidney: experience 
in children. 
 
BJU Int 
 
 2004; 
 
93 
 
: 388–92 
2 
 
Gordon AC, Thomas DF, Arthur RJ, 
Irving HC. 
 
Multicystic dysplastic kidney: 
is nephrectomy still appropriate? 
 
J Urol 
 
 
1988; 
 
140 
 
: 1231–4 
3 
 
Beckwith JB. 
 
Wilms tumor and 
multicystic dysplastic kidney disease. 
Editorial Comment. 
 
J Urol 
 
 1997; 
 
158 
 
: 
2259–60 
4 
 
Rickwood AM, Anderson PA, Williams 
MP. 
 
Multicystic renal dysplasia detected 
by prenatal ultrasonography. Natural 
history and results of conservative 
management. 
 
Br J Urol 
 
 1992; 
 
69 
 
: 538–40 
5 
 
Bloom DA, Brosman S. 
 
The multicystic 
kidney. 
 
J Urol 
 
 1978; 
 
120 
 
: 211–5 
6 
 
Eckoldt F, Woderich R, Smith RD, 
Heling KS. 
 
Antenatal diagnostic aspects 
of unilateral multicystic kidney dysplasia 
– sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, 
differential diagnoses, associated 
malformations and consequences. 
 
Fetal 
Diagn Ther 
 
 2004; 
 
19 
 
: 163–9 
7 
 
Mandell J, Paltiel HJ, Peters CA, 
Benacerraf BR. 
 
Prenatal findings 
associated with a unilateral 
nonfunctioning or absent kidney. 
 
J Urol 
 
 
1994; 
 
152 
 
: 176–8 
8 
 
Bhide A, Sairam S, Farrugia MK, Boddy 
SA, Thilaganathan B. 
 
The sensitivity of 
antenatal ultrasound for predicting renal 
tract surgery in early childhood. 
 
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 
 
 2005; 
 
25 
 
: 
489–92 
9 
 
Eckoldt F, Woderich R, Wolke S, Heling 
KS, Stover B, Tennstedt C. 
 
Follow-up of 
unilateral multicystic kidney dysplasia 
after prenatal diagnosis. 
 
J Matern Fetal 
Neonatal Med 
 
 2003; 
 
14 
 
: 177–86 
10 
 
Flack CE, Bellinger MF. 
 
The multicystic 
dysplastic kidney and contralateral 
vesicoureteral reflux: protection of the 
solitary kidney. 
 
J Urol 
 
 1993; 
 
150 
 
: 1873–4 
11 
 
Ismaili K, Avni FE, Alexander M, 
Schulman C, Collier F, Hall M. 
 
Routine 
voiding cystourethrography is of no value 
in neonates with unilateral multicystic 
dysplastic kidney. 
 
J Pediatr 
 
 2005; 
 
146 
 
: 
759–63 
12 
 
Miller DC, Rumohr JA, Dunn RL, Bloom 
 
CAMBIO 
 
ET AL. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
DA, Park JM. 
 
What is the fate of the 
refluxing contralateral kidney in children 
with multicystic dysplastic kidney? 
 
J Urol 
 
 
2004; 
 
172 
 
: 1630–4 
13 
 
Rottenberg GT, Gordon I, De Bruyn R. 
 
The natural history of the multicystic 
dysplastic kidney in children. 
 
Br J Radiol 
 
 
1997; 
 
70 
 
: 347–50 
14 
 
Selzman AA, Elder JS. 
 
Contralateral 
vesicoureteral reflux in children with a 
multicystic kidney. 
 
J Urol 
 
 1995; 
 
153 
 
: 
1252–4 
15 
 
Heymans C, Breysem L, Proesmans 
W. 
 
Multicystic kidney dysplasia: a 
prospective study on the natural history 
of the affected and the contralateral 
kidney. 
 
Eur J Pediatr 
 
 1998; 
 
157 
 
: 673–5 
16 
 
Rabelo EA, Oliveira EA, Diniz JS 
 
et al. 
 
 
Natural history of multicystic kidney 
conservatively managed: a prospective 
study. 
 
Pediatr Nephrol 
 
 2004; 
 
19 
 
: 1102–7 
17 
 
Rabelo EA, Oliveira EA, Silva GS, 
Pezzuti IL, Tatsuo ES. 
 
Predictive factors 
of ultrasonographic involution of 
prenatally detected multicystic dysplastic 
kidney. 
 
BJU Int 
 
 2005; 
 
95 
 
: 868–71 
18 
 
Narchi H. 
 
Risk of hypertension with 
multicystic kidney disease: a systematic 
review. 
 
Arch Dis Child 
 
 2005; 
 
90 
 
: 921–4 
19 
 
Wacksman J, Phipps L. 
 
Report of the 
Multicystic Kidney Registry: preliminary 
findings. 
 
J Urol 
 
 1993; 
 
150 
 
: 1870–2 
20 
 
Husmann DA. 
 
Renal dysplasia: the risks 
and consequences of leaving dysplastic 
tissue in situ. 
 
Urology 
 
 1998; 
 
52 
 
: 533–6 
21 
 
de Oliveira-Filho AG, Carvalho MH, 
Sbragia-Neto L, Miranda ML, Bustorff- 
Silva JM, de Oliveira ER. 
 
Wilms tumor in 
a prenatally diagnosed multicystic kidney. 
 
J Urol 
 
 1997; 
 
158 
 
: 1926–7 
22 
 
Minevich E, Wacksman J, Phipps L, 
Lewis AG, Sheldon CA. 
 
The Importance 
of accurate diagnosis and early close 
followup in patients with suspected 
multicystic dysplastic kidney. 
 
J Urol 
 
 1997; 
 
158 
 
: 1301–4 
23 
 
Homsy YL, Anderson JH, Oudjhane K, 
Russo P. 
 
Wilms tumor and multicystic 
dysplastic kidney disease. 
 
J Urol 
 
 1997; 
 
158 
 
: 2256–9 
24 
 
Oddone M, Marino C, Sergi C 
 
et al. 
 
 
Wilms’ tumor arising in a multicystic 
kidney. 
 
Pediatr Radiol 
 
 1994; 
 
24 
 
: 
236–8 
25 
 
Dimmick JE, Johnson HW, Coleman GU, 
Carter M. 
 
Wilms tumorlet, nodular renal 
blastema and multicystic renal dysplasia. 
J Urol 1989; 142: 484–5 
26 Hartman GE, Smolik LM, Shochat SJ. 
The dilemma of the multicystic dysplastic 
kidney. Am J Dis Child 1986; 140: 925– 
8 
27 Raffensperger J, Abousleiman A. 
Abdominal masses in children under on 
year of age. Surgery 1968; 63: 514–21 
28 Uson AC, Del Rosario C, Melicow MM. 
Wilms tumor in association with cystic 
renal disease: report of two cases. J Urol 
1960; 83: 262–6 
29 Elder JS, Hladky D, Selzman AA. 
Outpatient nephrectomy for 
nonfunctioning kidneys. J Urol 1995; 154: 
712–4 
30 Noe HN, Marshall JH, Edwards OP. 
Nodular renal blastema in the multicystic 
kidney. J Urol 1989; 142: 486–8 
31 Beckwith JB. The John Lattimer lecture. 
Wilms tumor and other renal tumors of 
childhood: an update. J Urol 1986; 136: 
320–4 
32 Narchi H. Risk of Wilms’ tumour with 
multicystic kidney disease: a systematic 
review. Arch Dis Child 2005; 90: 147–9 
33 Yerkes EB, Adams MC, Pope J, Ct 
Brock JW 3rd. Does every patient with 
prenatal hydronephrosis need voiding 
cystourethrography? J Urol 1999; 162: 
1218–20 
34 Anonymous National High Blood 
Pressure Education Program Working 
Group on High Blood Pressure in 
Children and Adults. The fourth report 
on the diagnosis, evaluation, and 
treatment of high blood pressure in 
children and adolescents. Pediatrics 2004; 
114: 555–76 
35 Choyke PL, Siegel MJ, Craft AW, Green 
DM, DeBaun MR. Screening for Wilms 
tumor in children with Beckwith– 
Wiedemann syndrome or idiopathic 
hemihypertrophy. Med Pediatr Oncol 
1999; 32: 196–200 
36 Hoyme HE, Seaver LH, Jones KL, 
Procopio F, Crooks W, Feingold M. 
Isolated hemihyperplasia 
(hemihypertrophy): report of a 
prospective multicenter study of the 
incidence of neoplasia and review. Am J 
Med Genet 1998; 79: 274–8 
Correspondence: Eric A. Kurzrock, Department 
of Urology, 4860 Y St., Suite 3500, 
Sacramento, CA 95817, USA. 
e-mail: 
 <script language='JavaScript' type='text/javascript'>
 <!--
 var prefix = 'ma' + 'il' + 'to';
 var path = 'hr' + 'ef' + '=';
 var addy15888 = 'eric.kurzrock' + '@';
 addy15888 = addy15888 + 'ucdmc' + '.' + 'ucdavis' + '.' + 'edu';
 document.write( '<a ' + path + '\'' + prefix + ':' + addy15888 + '\'>' );
 document.write( addy15888 );
 document.write( '<\/a>' );
 //-->\n </script><script language='JavaScript' type='text/javascript'>
 <!--
 document.write( '<span style=\'display: none;\'>' );
 //-->
 </script>This email address is being protected from spam bots, you need Javascript enabled to view it
 <script language='JavaScript' type='text/javascript'>
 <!--
 document.write( '</' );
 document.write( 'span>' );
 //-->
 </script> 
Abbreviations: MCDK, multicystic dysplastic 
kidney; US, ultrasonography; VCUG, voiding 
cysto-urethrography; WT, Wilms’ tumour; 
BWS, Beckwith–Wiedmann syndrome; IHH, 
idiopathic hemihypertrophy.

download Flash Player

More BJUI Mini Reviews and Archives on UroToday.com

View PDF

Reader Comments

Please log-in or register in order to submit comments.

Powered by AkoComment!

 
User Rating: / 0
PoorBest


 
< Prev   Next >