Home
October 2009 November 2009 December 2009
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
Week 45 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Week 46 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Week 47 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
Week 48 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Week 49 29 30
Reach urologists

European Urology - Urinary Diversion Highlights Show Comments PDF Print E-mail
  
Monday, 11 December 2006
Volume 50, Issue 6, Pages 1139-1150 (December 2006)

Article Outline:

Without any exaggeration, the 20th century was “the century of urinary diversion”. To put this article from the Mainz group, with Thueroff as first author and Hohenfellner as senior author into the right perspective, a brief review of the history of the continent urinary diversion is appropriate. This becomes obvious when studying the author's references, which date honestly and correctly back to 1910, when Makkas (reference no. 29 in the article) described the use of the excluded ileocaecal segment as reservoir and the appendix as an outlet valve. The long way to a reliable continent diversion was clearly a multistep development and we have been successful because we have been standing on the shoulders of giants.

1. Historical aspects of continent urinary diversion to the skin

An exhaustive description of one century's work in regard to urinary diversion is beyond the scope of this article. An excellent overview and critical analysis has been compiled by Studer and coworkers [1]. The interested reader is referred to this article. In brief:

“J. Simon published the first attempt at continent urinary drainage in 1852, which was a case of ureterosigmoidostomy for ectopia vesicae. In the following years, this technique of simple implantation of the ureter into the intestines was used in several cases, but the patients died relatively early after the operation because of anastomotic incompetence and/or the serious consequences of the reflux of fecal material from the intestine into the upper urinary tract. An alternative attempt of reducing septic complications in the preantibiotic era was by separating the faeces from urine completely. Others, such as Verhoogen (1908), Makkas (1910), Lengemann (1912) used the excluded ileocecal segment as a reservoir and the appendix as an outlet valve. After the first attempts of continent urinary diversion with the use of the ileocecal segment at the beginning of this century, Gilchrist and Merricks reintroduced in 1950 the concept of the continent pouch. It was simple because only intact anatomical structures were used: the caecum as reservoir, and, instead of the appendix, the ileocecal valve and the terminal anisoperistaltic segment of the ileum as antireflux mechanism. This had been prompted by studies published in Argentina by Gallo in 1946, by Santander in 1952 and by Mann and Bollmann in 1931. The original good results in respect of continence could not be confirmed subsequently by other authors for reasons which will be discusses later. However, the idea of the “continent skin stoma” remained. The technique which was most frequently used to assure continence is invagination or intussusception of a segment of the small intestine. The technique was first described in 1949 by Perl for a continent alimentary jejunostomy. The principle was used by Ashken (1974) and Mansson (1977) among others with a cecal reservoir. The “hydraulic valve” with inversion of an ileal segment, described in 1974 by Benchekroun, is based on the same principle: compression of the nipple valve by the surrounding fluid which transmits the intra luminal pressure to the outlet valve. Retrospectively, many disappointing results with various forms of continent suprapubic diversion were often not caused by insufficient competence of the outlet valve, but because the intestinal reservoir maintained its peristaltic properties causing high pressure peaks.

The decisive advance in ensuring continence, and thus an improvement in the comfort of the patient, was achieved through the combination of the continent stoma and a so-called low-pressure reservoir. The main characteristics of this reservoir compared with those from intact segments of intestine are the larger diameter, the greater capacity with significantly lower internal pressures, and the uncoordinated contraction of its wall. The direct consequence of this, theoretically at least, is that the demands made on the anti-efflux and antireflux mechanisms are significantly reduced. Transsection of the circular intestinal musculature when performing bladder augmentation has already been puplished [sic] by Rutkowski in 1899. Tasker (1953) and Giertz (1957) plicated detubularized ileum, whereas Goodwin (1959) double folded it.

The significant advantages of interrupting the tubular stricture of a reservoir obtained from intestine were described by Ekman and Kock in 1964. Also, the superiority of Goodwin's cup-patch technique with four intestinal segments per cross-section over the neo tubular reservoirs with two intestinal segments per cross-section as proposed by Tasker and Giertz had been clearly shown by then. In 1969, Kock published the first results obtained with an ileal continent fecal reservoir in patients after total proctocolectomy. Basically, he used Goodwin's cup-patch technique for the reservoir and intussuscepted ileal nipples. In 1976, Leisinger reported early clinical experiences on the use of the same reservoir for the continent drainage of urine” [1].

2. Why is this a landmark article?

There can be no doubt that the authors have drawn the proper conclusions from a century's work on urinary diversion and picked the right moment to introduce this concept of the Mainz pouch into the modern urologist's armamentarium, when that was technically feasible, at least in departments with a major interest in urinary diversion.

From the very beginning, the Achilles heel of continent cutaneous diversion has been the outlet valve. Again, this is reported honestly by the authors: for sphincteric control, an alloplastic stomal prosthesis for simple mechanical closure was implanted or an isoperistaltic ileoileal invagination was fashioned.

A recent SIU/ICUD/World Health Organization consensus conference on bladder cancer included the evaluation of the current status of urinary diversion [2]. The Achilles heel of the Kock ileal reservoir remained the intussuscepted nipple valve. Most complications associated with the Kock ileal reservoir involve either the antirefluxing (afferent limb) nipple or the continent catheterisation (efferent limb) nipple. Despite several surgical modifications to improve on the construction of the intussuscepted nipple valve, there remained complications and a certain reoperation rate.

Several alternative techniques may be applied to create a dependable, continent catheterisable efferent limb including: (1) appendiceal techniques, (2) tapered or imbricated terminal ileum and ileocecal valve, and (3) a flap-valve technique such as the serous-lined extramural tunnel or efferent T mechanism.

Although these techniques may provide a catheterisable continence mechanism, each has its own limitations. The ideal outlet should be constructed from a readily available and surgically versatile intestinal segment without the need for synthetic materials. It should provide reliable continence and allow for easy catheterisation in the long-term. It is important to note that when revision surgery is performed for the continence mechanism, the existing reservoir portion of the urinary diversion should be maintained (and, if necessary, augmented) with the new catheterisable efferent limb providing the continent mechanism.

The appendix may provide for an effective continence mechanism as was first described by Mitrofanoff [3]. The in situ appendix can be tunnelled into a caecal tenia similarly to a ureterocolonic anastomosis (with preservation of the mesentery). The appendiceal continence mechanism has been criticised for three reasons. First, the appendix may be unavailable because of prior appendectomy. Second, the appendiceal stump may be too short to reach the anterior abdominal wall. Lastly, the calibre of the appendix may be small and may make reservoir urine and mucus more difficult to eliminate. However, if an appropriate appendix is available, it can provide an effective continence mechanism. A slight modification of the Mitrofanoff principle was described by Monti in which a 2- to 3-cm segment of ileum is used and reconfigured into a tube; this tube can then be tunnelled into the colon to provide a continence mechanism [4].

The second major type of continence mechanism that can be used for an intussuscept nipple failure is the tapered or imbricated terminal ileum and ileocaecal valve. The principle evolved from the Gilchrist procedure described in 1950 (see the original article). In this situation, imbrication and plication of the ileocaecal valve region along with tapering of the more proximal ileum can provide an acceptable continence mechanism. This technique can be easily performed. However, criticisms of this continent cutaneous mechanism include the loss of the ileocaecal valve and potential for bowel dysfunction. In addition, this outlet relies mostly on passive tubular resistance (extraluminal valve) and will leak at higher reservoir pressures.

The third general type of procedure for developing a continence mechanism incorporates a flap-valve technique. The principle of embedding a tubular structure with a serous-lined extramural tunnel was first developed by Abol-Enein and Ghoneim [5]. This is a versatile technique that was used initially and successfully for reflux prevention in conjunction with an orthotopic ileal bladder. Because the technique of embedding a tubular structure within a serous-lined extramural tunnel provides unidirectional flow of urine, the feasibility of constructing a continent cutaneous outlet was explored and confirmed experimentally in animals first.

Continence is provided by a passive mechanism derived from tubular resistance of the anchored and tapered segment and, most importantly, a dynamic mechanism that results from embedding the outlet with the wall of the reservoir—a flap-valve technique. This combination prevents leakage even at high pressures within the reservoir (intraluminal valve). A modification of the serous-lined extramural tunnel was subsequently developed and named the T mechanism. This surgical technique incorporates an extramural serous-lined flap-valve technique. This technique was first developed to eliminate the inherent problems with the intussuscept Kock nipple valve. This T mechanism was initially applied as an antireflux technique in the T pouch ileal neo-bladder [6] and subsequently applied to a continent cutaneous ileal reservoir, creating an afferent antireflux, and continent efferent catheterisable mechanism called the double-T pouch.

As previously mentioned, most reconstructive surgeons have abandoned the intussuscept nipple valve largely due to the technical difficulties of pouch construction and the association significant complication rates. Alternative and effective techniques for the creation of a continent cutaneous catheterisable mechanism have been developed. This evolution in urinary diversion must not be viewed as a condemnation of the brilliant and pioneering work. Rather, these are the natural improvements and refinement of reconstructive surgical techniques that occur over time.

3. Current practice

The members of the consensus panel [2] perform continent cutaneous diversions in only 7% of their patients (orthotopic 47%, conduit 33%, anal 10%, and 3% others). Nevertheless, important indications for continent cutaneous diversion remain:

(1)Urethral removal is deemed necessary because of a high risk of recurrence.

(2)Patients prefer continent diversion over orthotopic diversion because of the risk of urinary leakage with the latter.

(3)In patients without cancer, particularly in the paediatric age group, when the closure mechanism and intact urethra are lacking, the procedure can be used.

This is in neurogenic patients (myelomeningocele) with incontinence (ecstrophy complex), loss of the urethra, and combined bladder/sphincteric dysfunction (actinic, interstitial cystitis).

References

1. Studer UE, Casanova GA, Zingg EJ. Historical aspects of continent urinary diversion. Probl Urol. 1991;5:197–202.

2. Hautmann RE, Abol-Enein H, Hafez K, et al., Urinary diversion in bladder tumours. In: Soloway M, Carmack A, Khoury S, editors. Paris, France: Health Publications, 2006. p. 239–307.

3. Mitrofanoff P. Cystostomie continent transappendiculaire dans le traitement des vessies neurologiques. Chir Pediatr. 1980;21:297–305.

4. Monti PR, Lara RC, Dutta MA, et al.. New techniques for construction of efferent conduits based on the Mitrofanoff principle. Urology. 1997;49:112–114.

5. Abol-Enein H, Ghoneim MA. A novel uretero-ileal reimplantation technique: the serous lined extramural tunnel. A preliminary report. J Urol. 1994;151:1193–1197.
6. Stein JP, Lieskovsky G, Ginsberg DA, Bochner BH, Skinner DG. The T pouch: an orthotopic ileal neobladder incorporating a serosal lined ileal antireflux technique. J Urol. 1998;159:1836–1842.

Richard E. Hautmann

Department of Urology, University of Ulm, Prittwitzstrasse 43, 89075 Ulm, Germany

published online 4 October 2006.

Reader Comments

Please log-in or register in order to submit comments.

Powered by AkoComment!

 
User Rating: / 0
PoorBest


 

Bookmark and Share
< Prev   Next >

Member's Section

Login

Sign Up

Quick Search

Featured Conference

Media and Publisher

Advertising Rates
Reprints

Working with Industry

Case Studies
Sponsorship Opportunities

Urologic Trauma
& Reconstruction
Sponsored By