| European Urology - Application of Paclitaxel-Eluting Metal Mesh Stents within the Pig Ureter: An Experimental Study |
|
|
|
|
|
| Monday, 01 January 2007 | ||
|
Volume 51, Issue 1, Pages 217-223 (January 2007) Abstract - Objective: The purpose of the present study is to compare the standard bare metal stents (BMS) with the Paclitaxel-Drug Eluting Stent (DES) in the ureter of a pig model. Materials and methods We report on an experimental study with ten female pigs weighing between 25 and 30kg. The stents were randomly placed in either the right or left ureter in each of 10 study animals, for a total of 20 stented ureters. Ten ureters were stented with an R-Stent (Orbus Medical Technologies, Hoevelaken Netherlands), and ten with a Paclitaxel-Eluting Coronary Stent (Boston Scientific, Natick, MA, USA). Patency was measured by radiograph of the nephrostomy tract, intravenous urography and virtual endoscopy at 24hours and 21 days after the initial procedure, respectively. Results
Free flow of urine through the stents into the bladder was documented in all stented ureters 24hours after stent insertion by radiograph of the nephrostomy tract. At the 21 day follow-up examination, 5 R-Stents were found to be completely occluded and two partially stenosed, whereas no occluded stent was detected in the Paclitaxel-DES group. Pathology examination of the stents at 21 days follow-up showed that the obstructed R-Stents generated severe inflammation with metaplasia of the urothelium. The Paclitaxel-Eluting MS generated a mild inflammatory response within the ureteral lumen at the site of the stent, without hindering ureteral patency. R-stents proved to develop more hyperplasia compared to the Paclitaxel-Eluting MS. Conclusions
Paclitaxel-DES, when compared with the standard R- Stent BMS, generated less inflammation and/or hyperplasia of the surrounding tissues, thus maintaining ureteral patency. Long-term animal trials are required to further validate our results. Evangelos N. Liatsikosa, Dimitrios Karnabatidisb, George C. Kagadisc, Kostantinos Rokkasa, Costas Constantinidesd, Nikolaos Christeasb, Nikolaos Flarise, Theodore Voudoukisa, Chrisoula D. Scopaf, Petros Perimenisa, Kriton S. Filose, George C. Nikiforidisc, Jens-Uwe Stolzenburgg, Dimitrios Siablisb a Department of Urology, University of Patras, School of Medicine, Patras, Greece b Department of Radiology, University of Patras, School of Medicine, Patras, Greece c Department of Medical Physics, University of Patras, School of Medicine, Patras, Greece d First Department of Urology, University of Athens Medical School, ‘Laikon’ General Hospital, Athens, Greece e Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, University of Patras, School of Medicine, Patras, Greece f Department of Pathology, University of Patras, School of Medicine, Patras, Greece g Department of Urology, University of Leipzig, Germany Accepted 31 May 2006 published online 15 June 2006.
Please log-in or register in order to submit comments. Powered by AkoComment! |
||
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|
|
UroToday, 1802 Fifth Street, Berkeley CA 94710 510.540.0930 (fax), info@urotoday.com ISSN 1939-4810
Privacy Policy | © 2009 UroToday ® All Rights Reserved |








