Home
April 2008 May 2008 June 2008
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
Week 18 1 2 3
Week 19 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Week 20 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
Week 21 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
Week 22 25 26 27 28 29 30 31

New Guidelines for Urinary Stone Treatment : Controversy or Development? - Abstract Show Comments PDF Print E-mail
  
Wednesday, 30 April 2008

Urologische Abteilung, Krankenanstalt Rudolfstiftung der Stadt Wien, Juchgasse 25, A-1030, Wien, Österreich.

This email address is being protected from spam bots, you need Javascript enabled to view it

The new guidelines of the European (EAU), American (AUA), German, and Austrian associations of urology are based on thorough and consistent research and analysis of the published literature. However, the methodology is very diverse. In the case of the EAU-AUA guidelines on ureteral stones, the evidence was generated by a laborious meta-analysis of the entire available published literature on the subject. These guidelines represent the 1A level of evidence. The traditional European guidelines evaluate each statement separately and assign a level of evidence to each.The following aspects are new: the even greater effort to formulate guidelines accompanied by the initiation of international cooperative projects, clarity of presentation and evaluation of the individual statements (including levels of evidence), information on medication-based treatment to facilitate spontaneous passage of ureteral stones as well as stone fragments after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL), a shift in the value of ESWL and ureterorenoscopy for ureteral stones, retrograde intrarenal surgery for small kidney stones refractory to ESWL or in settings unsuitable for ESWL, the use of laparoscopy in those rare cases that represent an indication for open surgery, and the additional value given to metaphylaxis in diagnosis and therapy.All of the new guidelines take these developments into account, although they differ slightly in the importance they assign to the individual items. The modifications represent the developments secondary to electronic data processing and preparation on the one hand and the rapid development of medical instruments on the other. Although ESWL is still the most important procedure for treating urinary stones, advances in flexible endoscopes, intracorporeal lithotripsy, and extraction instruments have led to a shift in the range of indications. These developments are fully accommodated in the new guidelines.

Article in German

Written by
Türk C, Knoll T, Köhrmann KU.

Reference
Urologe A. 2008 Apr 12. Epub ahead of print.
doi:10.1007/s00120-008-1730-5

PubMed Abstract
PMID:18408910

UroToday.com Stone Disease Section

Reader Comments

Please log-in or register in order to submit comments.

Powered by AkoComment!

 
User Rating: / 0
PoorBest


 
< Prev   Next >