Home
October 2009 November 2009 December 2009
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
Week 45 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Week 46 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Week 47 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
Week 48 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Week 49 29 30
Reach urologists

Reprogramming Requirements After Sacral Nerve Stimulator Implantation: Correlation With Preoperative Indication - Abstract Show Comments PDF Print E-mail
  
Friday, 18 January 2008

Department of Urology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois

Recent publications support sacral nerve stimulator implantation in patients with interstitial cystitis. To our knowledge the reprogramming requirements for all patients following stimulator implantation has not been described and it is unknown whether the number of sessions required vary by pre-implantation diagnosis. We determined overall reprogramming requirements following nerve stimulator implantation and whether requirements vary based on preoperative indication.

After obtaining institutional review board approval we retrospectively reviewed the records of all patients who underwent sacral nerve stimulator implantation at our institution between June 2002 and October 2004. The preoperative indication and number of reprogramming sessions during the initial test period (stage 1) and following permanent implantation (stage 2) were compared.

The 17 patients proceeding to stage 2 with a minimum 12-month followup during the study period were included. Mean age was 43 years (range 26 to 78) and all patients except 1 were female. Patients were separated by diagnosis for evaluation purposes, including urgency/frequency/incontinence in 8, urinary retention in 2 and interstitial cystitis in 7. The average number of reprogramming sessions during stage 1 was 0.9, 3.5 and 2.3 for urgency/frequency/incontinence, urinary retention and interstitial cystitis, respectively. The average number of reprogramming sessions after stage 2 was 2.8, 3.0 and 6.9 at 12-month followup for urgency/frequency/incontinence, urinary retention and interstitial cystitis, respectively. No patient had the stimulator removed for reprogramming failure.

Patients in urinary retention appear to require more frequent reprogramming during stage 1, while patients with interstitial cystitis require more sessions after stage 2 implantation.

Written by
Maxwell KM, Clemens JQ, Mazzenga L, Kielb SJ.

Reference
J Urol. 2007 Dec 11 [Epub ahead of print]
doi:10.1016/j.juro.2007.09.071

PubMed Abstract
PMID:18076913

UroToday.com Painful Bladder Syndrome Section

Reader Comments

Please log-in or register in order to submit comments.

Powered by AkoComment!

 
User Rating: / 1
PoorBest


 
Visitor Ratings:
No Affiliation:
4 (1 votes)


Bookmark and Share

Member's Section

Login

Sign Up

Quick Search

Featured Conference

Media and Publisher

Advertising Rates
Reprints

Working with Industry

Case Studies
Sponsorship Opportunities

Interstitial Cystitis
Sponsored By