| Frequency and Distribution of Multiple Diagnoses in Chronic Pelvic Pain Related to Previous Abuse or Drug-Seeking Behavior |
|
|
|
|
|
| Thursday, 13 March 2008 | ||||
|
BERKELEY, CA UroToday.com - The majority of pelvic pain patients have more than one pain generating diagnosis.
Chronic pelvic pain afflicts up to 10% of women and results in billions of dollars in direct and indirect costs. Fenton and colleagues from an Akron, Ohio Pain Center determined the frequency and distribution of multiple pain-generating diagnoses in their chronic pelvic pain center and also explored the relationship to previous abuse and drug-seeking behavior.
One hundred seventy-five consecutive patients were evaluated and included in this study. Seventy-seven percent had gynecologic pain, including 35% of the total population diagnosed with interstitial cystitis. Forty-five percent had myalgia and only 5% had vulvodynia. Fully 55% of the patients had a history of abuse. The more diagnoses the patients had, the higher the likelihood of abuse. Ninety percent of the BPS/IC patients carried another diagnosis as well, and 32% had 3 more diagnoses. Patients with multiple pain diagnoses were similar to those with a history of abuse in that they had higher irritative bowel and bladder scores along with more regions of their body generating pain in addition to their pelvic pain. They did not have higher pain scores or a longer duration of pain. Patients with a history of abuse did not complain of higher levels of pain in any category, however, they did have more irritative voiding and bowel symptoms and noted pain in more areas of their bodies, even when controlled for multiple diagnoses or drug seeking. The type of abuse was not further spelled out in this paper, and the distribution of diagnoses was undoubtedly skewed by the inherent specialty of the center, as the authors acknowledge. The study is interesting as a 30,000 foot overview, and indicates the need for more focused, stringent, data and hypothesis driven studies in the future. Bradford W. Fenton, Christopher Durner, James Fanning Gynecol Obstet Invest 2008;65:247-251 PubMed Abstract
Please log-in or register in order to submit comments. Powered by AkoComment! |
||||
|
UroToday, 1802 Fifth Street, Berkeley CA 94710 510.540.0930 (fax), info@urotoday.com ISSN 1939-4810
Privacy Policy | © 2008 UroToday ® All Rights Reserved |









