Home
January 2010 February 2010 March 2010
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
Week 5 1 2 3 4 5 6
Week 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
Week 7 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Week 8 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
Week 9 28
Reach urologists

Long-term outcomes of urgency-frequency syndrome due to painful bladder syndrome treated with sacral neuromodulation and analysis of failures - Abstract Show Comments PDF Print E-mail
  
Wednesday, 25 November 2009

Department of Urology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa.

We present our long-term experience with sacral neuromodulation devices placed in patients with painful bladder syndrome to determine whether the benefit decreases over time.

Between January 2000 and July 2004, 32 women and 7 men with interstitial cystitis/painful bladder syndrome in whom previous conventional therapy failed underwent sacral neuromodulation test stimulation. Before 2003 a percutaneous test lead was placed in the clinic setting. After 2003 a quadripolar permanent lead was placed in the operating room. Permanent generators were implanted if the patient had more than 50% relief from the presenting complaint, which was defined as urinary or pelvic pain, urgency, or urinary frequency. Long-term outcomes included battery depletion, device malfunction, infection or loss of benefit as well as any change in need for medications.

Of 39 patients 22 went from test stimulation to permanent generator implantation. There were significant differences in short-term but not long-term outcomes between the 2 methods of test stimulation. Of 33 patients undergoing percutaneous nerve evaluation 13 (39.4%) met the criteria for permanent generator implantation, while 9 of 11 (81.8%) evaluated with the quadripolar lead met these criteria (p = 0.015). Long-term success between the groups was similar at 92.3% (12 of 13) vs 77.8% (7 of 9) (p = 0.329) during an average followup of 59.9 months. Eleven (50.0%) devices required explantation. Of 22 patients 3 (13.6%) lost benefit over time.

These patients appear to respond best to permanent quadripolar lead placement but long-term results do not appear to be independently affected by the method of test stimulation. Loss of benefit over time is not common.

Written by:
Powell CR, Kreder KJ.   Are you the author?

Reference:
J Urol. 2009 Nov 12. Epub ahead of print.
doi:10.1016/j.juro.2009.08.142

PubMed Abstract
PMID:19913835

UroToday.com IC/PBS/BPS Section

Reader Comments

Please log-in or register in order to submit comments.

Powered by AkoComment!

 
User Rating: / 0
PoorBest


 

Bookmark and Share
< Prev   Next >

Member's Section

Login

Sign Up

Quick Search

Featured Conference

Media and Publisher

Advertising Rates

Working with Industry

Case Studies
Sponsorship Opportunities

Interstitial Cystitis
Sponsored By