Home
August 2008 September 2008 October 2008
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
Week 36 1 2 3 4 5 6
Week 37 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
Week 38 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Week 39 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
Week 40 28 29 30

Is Routine Radiological Surveillance Mandatory After Uncomplicated Ureteroscopic Stone Removal? Show Comments PDF Print E-mail
  
Thursday, 15 May 2008

BERKELEY, CA (UroToday.com) - Radiographic imaging surveillance for stricture formation and obstruction would seem not to be mandatory after uncomplicated ureteroscopy and stone removal.

This study from Turkey included 268 patients with ureteral stones having a mean size of 1.7 cm (range 0.8-3.0 cm). All patients were treated with an 8 or 10 French semi-rigid ureterscope, pneumatic lithotripter and stone baskets. A ureteral stent or ureteral catheter was placed in 60% of the patients and all patients underwent a KUB on post-operative day 1, post-operative day 10 and then an IVU and/or ultrasound at 3 months post-operatively and then annually.

Complete stone clearance was achieved in 95.5% of patients at 3 months follow-up. There were no ureteral avulsions or perforations. Forty (15%) of patients complained of symptoms at 3 months and 2 (5%) of these patients had obstruction from a distal ureteral stricture (1) or residual stone fragments (1). Of the 228 asymptomatic patients, one (0.4%) had silent obstruction at 3 months from a distal ureteral stricture and residual stone fragments.

At a mean follow-up of 27 months no additional complications were identified. None of the patients who were stone free on post operative day 1 developed obstruction at longer follow-up. Therefore, patients who have an uncomplicated ureteroscopy and stone removal procedure and are deemed stone free on post-operative day 1 require no further radiographic imaging. However, any patient with a complex or complicated surgical procedure, residual stone on post-operative day 1 radiographic imaging, or post-operative symptoms should be followed closely with imaging to detect obstruction.

Karadag MA, Tefekli A, Altunrende F, Tepeler A, Baykal M, Muslumanoglu AY

J Endourol. 2008 Feb;22(2):261-6
doi: 10.1089/end.2006.0445

PubMed Abstract
PMID: 18294031

UroToday.com Painful Bladder Syndrome Section

Written by Elspeth M. McDougall, MD, a Contributing Editor with UroToday.

Reader Comments

Please log-in or register in order to submit comments.

Powered by AkoComment!

 
User Rating: / 0
PoorBest


 
< Prev   Next >