Home
June 2008 July 2008 August 2008
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
Week 27 1 2 3 4 5
Week 28 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Week 29 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
Week 30 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
Week 31 27 28 29 30 31

Urodynamic Measures Do Not Predict Stress Continence Outcomes After Surgery for Stress Urinary Incontinence in Selected Women - Abstract Show Comments PDF Print E-mail
  
Wednesday, 12 March 2008

University of California, San Diego, California (CWN).

We determined the prognostic value of preoperative urodynamic results in patients with stress urinary incontinence.

In a 9-center surgical trial, women with stress urinary incontinence were randomized to a Burch or pubovaginal sling procedure. Women were eligible for the study if they had predominant stress urinary incontinence symptoms, a positive cough stress test, a bladder capacity more than 200 ml and urethral hypermobility. Preoperative free uroflowmetry, filling cystometry and pressure flow studies were performed in all. Overall treatment success required a negative pad test, no urinary incontinence on a 3-day diary, a negative stress test, no self-reported stress urinary incontinence symptoms and no re-treatment for stress urinary incontinence. Stress specific success required all of the last 3 criteria. We examined urodynamic measures, and whether the presence of urodynamic stress incontinence, the presence of detrusor overactivity and Valsalva leak point pressure would predict surgical success.

Subjects with urodynamic stress incontinence had a 2-fold greater odds of overall success when compared with the No urodynamic stress incontinence group, but this trend did not quite reach statistical significance (OR 2.26; 95% C.I. 0.99, 5.17). Odds of stress specific success did not differ by urodynamic stress incontinence status. Subjects with detrusor overactivity did not have significantly worse success rates. Stratifying by treatment group, there was no difference in mean Valsalva leak point pressure values between surgical successes and failures.

We found a nearly statistically significant trend that women with urodynamic stress incontinence are twice as likely to have a successful overall outcome from surgical management of stress urinary incontinence as women without urodynamic stress incontinence. The level of Valsalva leak point pressure and the presence of detrusor overactivity do not predict the success outcomes after the Burch or autologous fascia sling procedures in women with pure or predominant stress urinary incontinence. The impact of urodynamic studies on surgical outcomes needs further investigation.

Written by
Nager CW, Fitzgerald M, Kraus SR, Chai TC, Zyczynski H, Sirls L, Lemack GE, Lloyd LK, J Litman H, Stoddard AM, Baker J, Steers W.

Reference
J Urol. 2008 Feb 21. Epub ahead of print.

PubMed Abstract
PMID:18295276

UroToday.com Stress Urinary Incontinence Section

Reader Comments
Prof.
Written by This email address is being protected from spam bots, you need Javascript enabled to view it on 2008-03-18 13:10:26
The most interesting observation of this randomized trial are equal outcomes of repositioning (Burch) vs. compressive (PVS)procedure. I believe it may result from taking into account mean VLPP values for evaluation of the outcomes. It is widely accepted and is also my personal experience that Burch colposuspension doesn´t work properly with ISD which is supposed to have at least 15 % of females with previously untreated SUI. Exclusion of possible ISD preoperatively in each individual patient is the key element of successful surgical treatment of female SUI.

Please log-in or register in order to submit comments.

Powered by AkoComment!

 
User Rating: / 1
PoorBest


 
Visitor Ratings:
No Affiliation:
5 (1 votes)