Home
October 2008 November 2008 December 2008
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
Week 44 1
Week 45 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Week 46 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Week 47 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
Week 48 23 24 25 26 27 28 29
Week 49 30

SUFU 2007 - Sacral Neuromodulation for Management of Voiding Dysfunction Refractory to Medical Therapy Following Hysterectomy Show Comments PDF Print E-mail
  
Thursday, 01 March 2007

Melissa R. Kaufman, Cory D. Harris, Jonathan S. Starkman, Douglas F. Milam, Harriette M. Scarpero, and Roger R. Dmochowski

Department of Urologic Surgery, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN

Introduction and Objectives: Management of complex voiding dysfunction following hysterectomy with sacral neuromodulation represents an expanding indication for this promising treatment modality. Herein we describe our experience treating women with voiding complaints related to surgical hysterectomy with sacral nerve stimulation (SNS).

Methods: A retrospective review of the Vanderbilt Sacral Neuromodulation Database was performed to identify patients who presented with voiding conditions whose onset corresponded to the time of their hysterectomy. Patient charts were evaluated for demographics, presenting symptoms, medical management regimens, urodynamic findings, and results from implantation of SNS including postoperative complications.

Results: Nine patients were identified that presented with voiding symptoms temporally associated with prior hysterectomy. Average patient age was 43 years (range 38 - 51 years). Five patients (63%) presented with findings of nonobstructive urinary retention. Two of these patients with retention had superimposed symptoms of urgency-frequency. The remaining 4 patients had diagnoses of urgency-frequency. Average duration of symptoms prior to presentation was 2.6 years (range 1 - 4 years). All patients with urinary retention were treated with clean intermittent catheterization prior to successful neuromodulator test response and subsequent SNS generator implantation. Patients with urgency-frequency were given a trial of anticholinergic medication preceding surgical intervention. There were no consistent urodynamic findings predicting success with SNS. Average length of follow up was 11 months (range 1 – 37 months). 4 patients had minor complications of wound infections, with 3/9 (33%) requiring lead revision or replacement of the SNS device. 7/9 patients (78%) recorded considerable subjective improvement (>90%) in voiding symptoms following neuromodulation with the remaining two patients reporting minimal or no improvement. Although 4/5 (80%) of the urinary retention patients indicated symptom improvement, 60% also continued to utilize clean intermittent catheterization at least once daily at last follow up. Only one patient remained on anticholinergic medications postoperatively and aside from revisions of the neuromodulator, no patient underwent further urologic surgeries for their voiding symptoms.

Conclusions: Sacral neuromodulation is gaining appreciation as a powerful tool in the urologic armamentarium for the treatment of complex voiding dysfunction. We present our experience with neuromodulation in a cohort of patients with voiding symptoms generated by prior hysterectomy. In the majority of cases in this select group sacral neuromodulation provided a substantial improvement in voiding complaints. Particularly in patients with nonobstructive urinary retention following hysterectomy, SNS appears to provide considerable symptom resolution with reasonably low morbidity.

UroToday.com Coverage of SUFU 2007

Reader Comments

Please log-in or register in order to submit comments.

Powered by AkoComment!

 
User Rating: / 0
PoorBest


 
< Prev   Next >