Home
September 2008 October 2008 November 2008
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
Week 40 1 2 3 4
Week 41 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Week 42 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
Week 43 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Week 44 26 27 28 29 30 31

SUFU 2007 - Differences between the Data of Free Flow and Intubated Flow in Women with Urinary Incontinence. What Do They Mean? Show Comments PDF Print E-mail
  
Thursday, 01 March 2007


Françoise Valentini, Brigitte Marti, Gilberte Robain, Pierre Nelson.

UMR S 731 INSERM/Université Pierre et Marie Curie-Paris 6, France.

Introduction and Objectives: Comparison between data from a free flow (FF) and an intubated flow (IF) in women has been little studied [1]. Our purposes were: 1) to search for differences between urodynamic data from FF and IF in women with urinary incontinence and 2) to use a mathematical model of micturition [2] to explain these differences.

Methods: Women with urinary incontinence have been evaluated between July 2002 and December 2004. Exclusion criteria were neurological diseases, diabetes mellitus and grade ≥ 2 prolapse. Urodynamics was performed with the Laborie’s Bonito® unit. Included files consisted of one FF (before cystometry) and one IF (10F triple-lumen urethral catheter) with voided volume >100 mL and continuous flow (voidings in privacy, in seated position). Analyzed parameters were 1) the volumes (initial Vini, voided Vu, residual Vr), Qmax, the flow time tmic and the ratios Vr/Vini, Qmax.IF /Qmax.FF and Qmax/Qave, and during IF 2) pdet.open and pdet.Qmax. Voidings with Vr/Vini > 20% were labelled V+, the others V- .

The VBN® model [2] allowed to evaluate for each recording the detrusor force, the urethra cross-section (each file must be interpreted with the same set of parameters) and to make simulations of pathophysiological hypothesis.

Results: a) Among 217 women, only 102 (47.0%), mean age 54.3 years [24-86], succeeded in FF and IF according to the required criteria. For these 102 women, the values of the voiding parameters are shown in the table.

Vini

Vu

Vr/Vini

Qmax

Qmax/Qave

tmic

FF

286±58 mL

277±161 mL

7.1±14.0%

27±13mL/s

1.54±.18

19±10 s

IF

391±149mL

347±144mL

12.6±20.1%

15±8 mL/s

1.47±.22

49±23 s

p

<.0001

<.0001

=.016

<.0001

n.s.

<.0001

b) Comparing FF/IF, 69 files were V-/V-, 9 V+/V+, 20 V-/V+ and 4 V+/V-.

Qmax.IF/ Qmax.FF was .45±.27 for the V-/V+ group, and .71±.49 for the V-/V- group while its theoretical value, due to the obstructive effect of the catheter, was 0.75: the weak Qmax.IF value in the V-/V+ group results from an additional phenomenon: fading of the detrusor excitation or/and incomplete sphincter relaxation (abnormal nervous control) due to the catheter in place.

c) No significant difference was found in pdet.open (20.3±16.5 vs 20.0±13.7 cmH2O) and pdet.Qmax (24.2±13.1 vs 27.2±16.7 cmH2O) between the IF(V-) and the IF(V+) groups. The increase of detrusor pressure must be sufficient to obtain complete bladder emptying. The theoretical time θ needed for achieve bladder emptying is Vini/Qave ≈ (1.5*Vini)/Qmax. In the V-/V+ group tmic < θ. Modelling shows that this result is consistent with an inhibition of the voiding process for micturition of long duration.

Conclusion: In the population of women able to void during the pressure-flow study, significant differences are found between the data of FF and IF. These differences cannot be explained only by mechanical effects due to the presence of a urethral catheter and could involve, in addition to the anxiety of the patient, a urethral reflex. These findings underline the necessity to combine a FF with an IF during a urodynamic session in order to increase the reliability of the conclusions of the urodynamic investigation.

[1] Urology, 2003, 62: 905-8. [2] Neurourol. Urodyn. 2000, 19(2): 153-176.

UroToday.com Coverage of SUFU 2007

Reader Comments

Please log-in or register in order to submit comments.

Powered by AkoComment!

 
User Rating: / 0
PoorBest


 
< Prev   Next >