Home
June 2008 July 2008 August 2008
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
Week 27 1 2 3 4 5
Week 28 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Week 29 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
Week 30 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
Week 31 27 28 29 30 31

Efficacy of Artificial Urinary Sphincter Implantation after Failed Bone-Anchored Male Sling for Postprostatectomy Incontinence - Abstract Show Comments PDF Print E-mail
  
Monday, 14 January 2008

Department of Urology, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan 48201, USA

To evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of artificial urinary sphincter placement after failed bone-anchored male sling for postprostatectomy stress urinary incontinence

Eleven patients with postprostatectomy stress urinary incontinence who failed bone-anchored male sling underwent artificial urinary sphincter placement. All patients were evaluated before and after artificial urinary sphincter placement with a history and physical examination, pad score, and the incontinence section of the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA)/RAND prostate cancer index (total score possible = 26). Urodynamic evaluation was performed before sphincter placement

The average age in our study population was 70 years (range, 51 to 80 years). The mean follow-up after artificial urinary sphincter placement was 14.2 months (range, 3 to 20 months). Incontinence was defined as mild (1 to 2 pads), moderate (3 to 5 pads), or severe (more then 5 pads). After sling placement, cure was defined as no pad use, failure as same pad usage, and improvement as fewer pads used. The severity of incontinence before artificial urinary sphincter placement was mild, moderate, and severe in 3, 1, and 7 patients, respectively. After artificial urinary sphincter placement the severity of incontinence was cured, mild, and moderate in 8, 2, and 0, respectively. One patient required artificial urinary sphincter removal because of infection. Mean UCLA/RAND scores increased from 10.8 to 19.7. Patient satisfaction after artificial urinary sphincter placement was 74.5%. No intraoperative complications or urethral injuries occurred.

Artificial urinary sphincter placement after failed bone-anchored male sling is technically feasible and does not affect the short-term efficacy of the artificial sphincter.

Written by
Fisher MB, Aggarwal N, Vuruskan H, Singla AK.

Reference
Urology. 2007 Nov;70(5):942-4
doi:10.1016/j.urology.2007.07.022

PubMed Abstract
PMID:18068452

UroToday.com Urinary Incontinence (UI) Section

Reader Comments

Please log-in or register in order to submit comments.

Powered by AkoComment!

 
User Rating: / 0
PoorBest


 
< Prev   Next >