Home
January 2010 February 2010 March 2010
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
Week 5 1 2 3 4 5 6
Week 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
Week 7 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Week 8 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
Week 9 28
Reach urologists

Prospective and Long-Term Evaluation of Erect Penile Length Obtained with Inflatable Penile Prosthesis to that Induced by Intracavernosal Injection - Abstract Show Comments PDF Print E-mail
  
Monday, 20 July 2009

Division of Urology, University of Texas Medical School at Houston, TX 77030, USA.

Department of Urology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.

We compared erect penile length after inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) implantation with that induced by in-tracavernosal injection (ICI) before surgery. A total of 11 patients with full erections induced by ICI of 0.25 mL of Trimix (papaverine, phentolamine and prostaglandin E1) at the time of penile color duplex Doppler ultrasonography were enrolled in this study. The patients subsequently underwent IPP implantation as the ultimate treatment for their erectile dysfunction (ED). Erect penile length consequent to IPP implantation was measured at 6 weeks, 6 months and at 1 year after surgery. The Sexual Health Inventory for Men (SHIM) was administered before, and at 6 months and 1 year after IPP implantation. Erect penile length (mean +/- s.e.) as induced by ICI was 13.2 +/- 0.4 cm, whereas the lengths attained with IPP were 12.4 +/- 0.3, 12.5 +/- 0.3 and 12.5 +/- 0.4 cm at the sixth week, sixth month and 1-year follow-ups, respectively. There were 0.83 +/- 0.25, 0.75 +/- 0.20 and 0.74 +/- 0.15 cm decreases in erect penile length at 6 weeks, 6 months and 1 year, respectively, after IPP implantation when compared with that after ICI (P < 0.05). The SHIM scores for patients reporting shorter penises were the same as those for patients without complaints at the 6-month and 1-year follow-ups (P > 0.05). To our knowledge, this is the first study to objectively show a significant decrease in erect penile length after IPP implantation when compared with that after ICI. However, this decrease did not affect the effectiveness of IPP in treating ED.

Written by:
Wang R, Howard GE, Hoang A, Yuan JH, Lin HC, Dai YT.   Are you the author?

Reference:
Asian J Androl. 2009 Jul;11(4):411-5.
doi:10.1038/aja.2009.35

PubMed Abstract
PMID:19525974

UroToday.com Erectile Dysfunction (ED) Section

Reader Comments

Please log-in or register in order to submit comments.

Powered by AkoComment!

 
User Rating: / 3
PoorBest


 
Visitor Ratings:
Healthcare Professionals:
4 (1 votes)

Patients:
5 (2 votes)


Bookmark and Share

Member's Section

Login

Sign Up

Quick Search

Meet the Expert


All Experts



Featured Conference

Media and Publisher

Advertising Rates

Working with Industry

Case Studies
Sponsorship Opportunities

Erectile Dysfunction
Sponsored By