Home
June 2008 July 2008 August 2008
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
Week 27 1 2 3 4 5
Week 28 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Week 29 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
Week 30 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
Week 31 27 28 29 30 31

Pharmacotherapy for Erectile Dysfunction - Abstract Show Comments PDF Print E-mail
  
Monday, 05 May 2008

Division of Urology, McGill University, Jewish General Hospital, 3755 Cote Ste Catherine, E-9, Montreal, Quebec, H3A 1A1, Canada.

To review advances in the pharmacological treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED) highlighting potential neuro-endocrine and molecular targets.

A comprehensive MEDLINE and PUBMED search was utilized to investigate current novel mechanistic approaches in treating erectile dysfunction. Search criteria included, but were not limited to, erectile dysfunction (ED), cGMP, nitric oxide, Rho-kinase, phosphodiesterase, gene therapy, apomorphine, melanocortin and corpora cavernosa. Articles relating to in vitro, animal and in vivo experimental therapy were evaluated and included in this review and future directions are described.

Current first-line ED treatment often involves the use of phosphodiesterase inhibitors. However, many novel pharmacotherapeutic approaches under development including the use of melanocortins and Rho-kinase inhibitors as well as the introduction of gene therapy have demonstrated efficacy in animal as well as early human trials.

The success of oral pharmacotherapy for ED has been accompanied by renewed interest into the ED pathophysiology and signal transduction pathways. This has led to the identification of new therapeutic targets, which are poised to change the dynamic of ED management by broadening treatment alternatives to include other oral and genetic therapies.

Written by
Feifer A, Carrier S.

Reference
Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2008 May;17(5):679-90.
doi:10.1517/13543784.17.5.679

PubMed Abstract
PMID:18447594

UroToday.com Erectile Dysfunction (ED) Section

 

Reader Comments

Please log-in or register in order to submit comments.

Powered by AkoComment!

 
User Rating: / 4
PoorBest


 
Visitor Ratings:
Healthcare Professionals:
4 (2 votes)

No Affiliation:
5 (2 votes)