Home
October 2009 November 2009 December 2009
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
Week 45 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Week 46 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Week 47 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
Week 48 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Week 49 29 30

Patterns of Switching Phosphodiesterase Type 5 Inhibitors in the Treatment of Erectile Dysfunction: Results from the Erectile Dysfunction Observational Study - Abstract Show Comments PDF Print E-mail
  
Tuesday, 20 November 2007

2nd Department of Urology, Papageorgiou General Hospital and Center for Sexual and Reproductive Health, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece

This report describes patterns of treatment changes with the phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) inhibitors tadalafil, sildenafil and vardenafil, and variables associated with those treatment changes, during the 6-month, prospective, pan-European Erectile Dysfunction Observational Study (EDOS).

EDOS observed 8047 men >/= 18 years old with erectile dysfunction (ED), who began or changed ED therapy as part of their routine healthcare. Patients could change ED treatment at any time during EDOS. Data were collected at baseline and at 3 (+/- 1) and 6 (+/- 1) months. Analyses included ED treatment-naïve patients with complete follow-up who were prescribed a PDE5 inhibitor at baseline (n = 4026).

Most patients, regardless of what PDE5 inhibitor they were prescribed at baseline, continued on that same PDE5 inhibitor throughout the study. Continuation rates were approximately 89% in the tadalafil cohort, vs. 63-64% in the sildenafil and vardenafil cohorts. The variables most strongly associated with increased risk of switching were prescription of sildenafil or vardenafil, vs. tadalafil, at baseline (odds ratios 4.43 and 4.14 respectively; p < 0.0001). Of patients who switched from tadalafil to another treatment, nearly 25% had switched back to tadalafil by study end. In contrast, of patients who switched from sildenafil or vardenafil, < 10% from each cohort had switched back to their original treatment by study end.

The data suggest that tadalafil treatment in treatment-naïve ED patients may increase their likelihood of treatment continuation. These findings should be interpreted conservatively due to the observational nature of the study.

Written by
Hatzichristou D, Haro JM, Martin-Morales A, von Keitz A, Riley A, Bertsch J, Belger M, Wolka AM, Beardsworth A; for the EDOS Group.

Reference
Int J Clin Pract. 2007 Nov;61(11):1850-62. Epub 2007 Sep 10
doi:10.1111/j.1742-1241.2007.01560.x

PubMed Abstract
PMID:17850306

UroToday.com Erectile Dysfunction (ED) Section

Reader Comments

Please log-in or register in order to submit comments.

Powered by AkoComment!

 
User Rating: / 1
PoorBest


 
Visitor Ratings:
Healthcare Professionals:
5 (1 votes)


Bookmark and Share

Member's Section

Login

Sign Up

Quick Search

Meet the Expert


All Experts


Featured Conference

Media and Publisher

Advertising Rates
Reprints

Working with Industry

Case Studies
Sponsorship Opportunities

Erectile Dysfunction
Sponsored By