Home
January 2010 February 2010 March 2010
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
Week 5 1 2 3 4 5 6
Week 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
Week 7 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Week 8 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
Week 9 28
Reach urologists

Comparison of 2-mum continuous wave laser vaporesection of the prostate and transurethral resection of the prostate: A prospective nonrandomized trial with 1-year follow-up - Abstract Show Comments PDF Print E-mail
  
Friday, 13 November 2009

Department of Urology, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Military Postgraduate Medical College, Beijing, People's Republic of China.

To compare the safety and efficacy of the 2-mum continuous wave (cw) laser vaporesection of the prostate with transurethral resection of prostate (TURP) in patients with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).

In this prospective study, 100 patients with a prostate weight of < 80 g underwent 2-mum cw laser vaporesection (n = 58) or TURP (n = 42). Efficacy follow-up included measurement of International Prostate Symptom Score, quality of life score, maximal urinary flow rate, and postvoid residual volume. Peri- and postoperative complications were also compared.

The mean operative time was slightly longer in the 2-mum laser group, 54.2 +/- 20.8 minutes, than the TURP group 42.0 +/- 10.5 minutes (P < .05). No blood transfusion was needed in the 2-mum laser group. Catheter indwelling time 1.8 +/- 0.3 days vs 3.4 +/- 1.9 days, and hospitalization time 3.2 +/- 1.6 days vs 6.5 +/- 2.4 day were shorter in 2-mum laser group than in TURP group (P < .05). Within the 12-month follow-up, the mean International Prostate Symptom Score improved by 85.4% in the laser group and 81.1% in the TURP group. Mean maximal urinary flow rate(.) increased 229.2% for the laser group and with a similar increase of 218% for the TURP group (P >.05); however, perioperative morbidity was less in the 2-mum laser group.

The 2-mum cw laser vaporesection is a novel technology with favorable perioperative safety as well as the same therapeutic effect as TURP, and has the advantage of significantly less blood loss, shorter hospitalization, and shorter catheter indwelling time.

Written by:
Fu WJ, Zhang X, Yang Y, Hong BF, Gao JP, Cai W, Zhang P, Wang XX.   Are you the author?

Reference:
Urology. 2009 Oct 10. Epub ahead of print.
doi:10.1016/j.urology.2009.07.1266

PubMed Abstract
PMID:19819535

UroToday.com BPH and Male LUTS Section

Reader Comments
Rocha Brito Urological Clinic Urologist
Written by This email address is being protected from spam bots, you need Javascript enabled to view it on 2009-11-16 11:30:44
The typical TURP means 2 or 3 days of catheter and hospital stay. This laser method needs a 10 years follow-up to watch re-treatments. If not too expensive, this technique will have its place in our armamentarium.

Please log-in or register in order to submit comments.

Powered by AkoComment!

 
User Rating: / 1
PoorBest


 
Visitor Ratings:
Healthcare Professionals:
4 (1 votes)


Bookmark and Share

Member's Section

Login

Sign Up

Quick Search

Meet the Expert


All Experts



Featured Conference

Media and Publisher

Advertising Rates

Working with Industry

Case Studies
Sponsorship Opportunities

BPH and Male LUTS
Sponsored By