Home
October 2009 November 2009 December 2009
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
Week 45 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Week 46 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Week 47 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
Week 48 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Week 49 29 30
Reach urologists

Second (2nd) Primary Malignancies Associated With Renal Cell Carcinoma Histological Subtypes - a review Show Comments PDF Print E-mail
  
Friday, 02 February 2007
BERKELEY, CA (UroToday.com) - While several population-based studies have found an association between renal cancer and lymphoma,

few studies have specifically evaluated the association between renal cancer and secondary malignancies using a comprehensive institutional renal cancer database.

In the September issue of the Journal of Urology, Thompson and colleagues from the Mayo Clinic reviewed their database of 2,722 patients who underwent nephrectomy at their institution for sporadic renal cancer over a 30 year-period. The risk of an antecendent, concurrent, or subsequent secondary malignancy was evaluated according to tumor histology.

Tumor histology was distributed as follows: conventional (80.4%), papillary (13.9%), chromophobe (4.7%), collecting duct (0.2%), purely sarcomatoid (0.1%), and unclassified ((0.7%). Median follow-up was approximately 7 years.

Compared with patients exhibiting conventional histology, patients with papillary renal cancer had a higher likelihood of having any secondary malignancy (26.5% vs. 18.5%, p = 0.001) or multiple malignancies (5.6% vs. 1.5%, p < 0.001).

Patients with papillary and chromophobe RCC were also more likely to have colon cancer when compared with conventional histology (3.7% vs. 2.0% and 5.5% vs. 2.0%, respectively, p 0.02). While there was no difference in the incidence of breast cancer by histology, men with papillary RCC exhibited a higher likelihood of prostate cancer when compared with men with conventional histology (15.3% vs. 9.6%, p =0.003).

These data with a cohort of patients treated for renal cancer in a single institution suggest that patients with papillary RCC may have a higher risk of secondary malignancies (particularly of the colon and prostate) when compared to conventional renal cancer. While these conclusions need to be validated in a larger cohort of patients, they underscore the importance of a thorough surveillance protocol including secondary malignancies.

Thompson RH, Leibovich BC, Cheville JC, Webster WS, Lohse CM, Kwon ED, Zincke H, Blute ML

Read Another Review

J Urol. 176(3): 900-904, 2006

Written by Ricardo Sånchez-Ortiz, MD, a Contributing Editor with UroToday.

Reader Comments

Please log-in or register in order to submit comments.

Powered by AkoComment!

 
User Rating: / 0
PoorBest


 

Bookmark and Share
< Prev   Next >

Member's Section

Login

Sign Up

Quick Search

Meet the Expert


All Experts


Featured Conference

Media and Publisher

Advertising Rates
Reprints

Working with Industry

Case Studies
Sponsorship Opportunities

Renal Cancer
Sponsored By