Home
October 2009 November 2009 December 2009
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
Week 45 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Week 46 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Week 47 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
Week 48 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Week 49 29 30

Renal Artery Occlusion During Nephron-Sparing Surgery: Retrospective Review of 301 Cases Show Comments PDF Print E-mail
  
Wednesday, 18 April 2007

BERKELEY, CA (UroToday.com) - Nephron sparing surgery for localized renal tumors has gained increasing acceptance as a standard of care in appropriately selected patients. Much has been made of the importance of limiting ischemia time to the kidney, during renal artery clamping and tumor resection, to avoid irreversible ischemic damage to the retained renal parenchyma. Some clinicians have proposed that the renal artery rarely needs to be occluded during tumor resection, but rather external compression ("the grip of death") can be used as an alternative to control bleeding during tumor resection and thus minimize ischemic time to the rest of the kidney. Here, Duvdevani and colleagues examine their experience with nephron sparing surgery over a 15 year period in a retrospective fashion, to determine the potential morbidity and benefits of renal artery occlusion during nephron sparing surgery for localized renal tumors.

The authors report on 301 patients who underwent nephron sparing surgery for a localized renal tumor. Of these, 181 patients had renal artery occlusion with cold ischemia, while the remaining 120 patients were managed with external compression alone to control hemorrhage. Mean tumor size was 3.56cm and there was a higher incidence of centralized tumors in the arterial occlusion group (p less than 0.05). The authors noted no difference in blood loss, transfusion rates, tumor size, or complications between the two groups. Two renal units (1.2%) were "lost" due to ischemic damage in the renal artery occlusion group, which was not a complication in the external compression group. More importantly, there was a significantly higher incidence of positive margins in the external compression group (4.2%) relative to the group with renal artery occlusion during resection (0.6%), (p less than 0.05).

Renal artery occlusion during partial nephrectomy may result in ischemic damage to the remaining renal parenchyma, particularly if prolonged, but is clearly superior for optimal visualization during tumor resection. This study demonstrates that external compression (the "grip of death") does not significantly minimize morbidity over renal artery clamping, and may, in fact, be associated with an increased positive margin rate due to poor visibility during tumor resection.

Duvdevani M, Mor Y, Kastin A, Laufer M, Nadu A, Golomb J, Zilberman D, Nativ O, Ramon J

UroToday.com Renal Cancer Section

Urology 68(5): 960-963, 2006.

Written by Christopher G. Wood, MD, a Contributing Editor with UroToday.

Reader Comments

Please log-in or register in order to submit comments.

Powered by AkoComment!

 
User Rating: / 0
PoorBest


 

Bookmark and Share
< Prev   Next >

Member's Section

Login

Sign Up

Quick Search

Meet the Expert


All Experts


Featured Conference

Media and Publisher

Advertising Rates
Reprints

Working with Industry

Case Studies
Sponsorship Opportunities

Renal Cancer
Sponsored By