Home
June 2009 July 2009 August 2009
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
Week 27 1 2 3 4
Week 28 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Week 29 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
Week 30 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Week 31 26 27 28 29 30 31

Reassessment of T Classification system Cutoff Value for Renal Cell Carcinoma - Abstract Show Comments PDF Print E-mail
  
Wednesday, 15 August 2007
Department of Urology, Akita University School of Medicine.

The 1997 T staging classification for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) defined T1 as tumors measuring up to 7 cm in size and T1 is subdivided into T1a and T1b with a 4 cm cutoff value in the 2002 TMN classification. We evaluated the validity of these cutoff values by assessing the cancer-specific survival of patients with non-metastatic RCC according to a series of alternative size cutoff values. In addition, we calculated how these size cutoffs affected the disease specific survival rates.

A database containing the records of 200 patients with RCC who underwent open radical nephrectomy for N0M0 disease between 1985 January and 2004 January was evaluated. Tumors were stratified by cutoff values ranging from 3 to 9 cm with the 1 cm increments in order to evaluate whether the 7 cm cutoff value is appropriate. Next, T1 RCC were stratified by cutoff values ranging from 3 to 6 cm with the 1 cm increment in order to verify whether the 4 cm cutoff is appropriate. Lastly, tumors over 7 cm diameter were stratified by cutoff values ranging from 9 to 14 cm with the 1 cm increments in order to verify whether the present T2-3a categories could be divided according to tumor size.

As for the T1-2 classification, a cutoff value at 7 cm or 8 cm shared the greatest prognostic power. Although there was no significant difference in T1a/T1b subclassification, a 4 cm or 5 cm cutoff value resulted in a greatest separation of survival curves for T1a and T1b. As for tumors from 9-14 cm in diameter, only a 13 cm cutoff value provided a significant difference in survival.

Our results indicate that the present 7 cm cutoff value in the TMN system is valid in terms of prognostic value. The 4 cm cutoff value may not reflect the survival when total nephrectomy is considered, thus indicating that tumors at 4 cm cutoff value may be valid when nephron sparing surgery is considered. The 13 cm cutoff value seems to be most appropriate in N0M0 tumors with over 7 cm in diameter.

Written by Obara T, Matsuura S, Inoue T, Kumazawa T, Abe A, Horikawa Y, Togashi H, Yuasa T, Tsuchiya N, Satoh S, Sato K, Habuchi T.

Reference

Nippon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi. 2007 Jul;98(5):671-6

Reader Comments

Please log-in or register in order to submit comments.

Powered by AkoComment!

 
User Rating: / 1
PoorBest


 
Visitor Ratings:
Healthcare Professionals:
4 (1 votes)


Bookmark and Share

Member's Section

Login

Sign Up

Quick Search

Meet the Expert


All Experts


Featured Conference

Complete WUF 2009 Coverage

Media and Publisher

Advertising Rates
Reprints

Working with Industry

Case Studies
Sponsorship Opportunities

Renal Cancer
Sponsored By