Home
October 2009 November 2009 December 2009
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
Week 45 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Week 46 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Week 47 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
Week 48 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Week 49 29 30
Reach urologists

24th WCE 2006 - Poster Session VP4 Show Comments PDF Print E-mail
Written by Michael C. Ost, MD   
Wednesday, 23 August 2006

This video poster section contained 25 abstracts with highlighted topics such as the percutaneous management of uretropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO), ureteroscopic management of upper tract transitional cell carcinoma (UTTCC) and stone disease, These video posters were as eclectic as they were outstanding.

In the era of laparoscopic pyeloplasty there is certainly still a role for percutaneous endopyelotomy. This is especially true in treating secondary UPJO. Dr. Mantu Gupta from Columbia University Medical Center reported on his experience with performing 120 Endopyelotomies over 8 years. Of interest were the 24 of 120 patients with secondary UPJO that were treated. The Success rate for endopyelotomy to address secondary UPJO was an impressive 91.7% (22/24). Interestingly, both failures were pediatric patients. This study supports the important role for endopyelotomy in the treatment of secondary UPJO.

Dr. BI Chung and colleagues from the Cleveland Clinic examined their data to determine the ideal endoscopic treatment (ureteroscopic vs percutaneous) for medium size (1-2 cm) renal calculi. It was found that both PCNL and ureteroscopy were equally effective treatment options for renal calculi between 1-2 cm with no statistically significant differences (i.e stone free rates, complications, operative times, etc.) between both modalities. It was concluded that the choice of treatment ultimately depends upon the individual surgeon’s preference and level of comfort.

Dr. RH Thompson et al from the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, MN presented data on their 20 year experience with the endoscopic management of upper tract transitional cell carcinoma (UTTCC). This experience might very well represent the largest series to date of patients with UTTCC treated by endoscopic means. In specific, 83 patients, the large majority (94%) with Ta disease, were followed-up of for a median of 4.6 years.

Significant findings included: 55% (46/83) developed UTTCC recurrences, 45% (37/83) developed bladder recurrences, 31% (26/83) progressed to nephroureterectomy, and 11% (9/83) died from urothelial cancer (Grade 3 tumors and CIS/T1 at highest risk). These findings underscore the importance of surveillance in the minimally invasive treatment (MIT) of UTTCC.

Dr. Hegarty’s paper from the Cleveland Clinic entitled, “Non-enhancement of renal radiolesion on follow-up MRI is not necessarily synonymous with “successful” radiofrequency ablation (RFA)” was voted the best video poster of the session. Follow-up percutaneous renal biopsy in 30 patients treated with RFA at 6 months revealed that cancer cells were present in 6; of these patients no enhancement on MRI was noted in 5. These finding suggest that RFA may not yet be an appropriate widespread treatment in the MIT treatment of small renal cancers.

Reader Comments

Please log-in or register in order to submit comments.

Powered by AkoComment!

 
User Rating: / 0
PoorBest


 

Bookmark and Share
< Prev   Next >

Member's Section

Login

Sign Up

Quick Search

Meet the Expert


All Experts


Featured Conference

Media and Publisher

Advertising Rates
Reprints

Working with Industry

Case Studies
Sponsorship Opportunities

Renal Cancer
Sponsored By