Home
October 2009 November 2009 December 2009
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
Week 45 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Week 46 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Week 47 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
Week 48 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Week 49 29 30
Reach urologists

Study Examines Outcomes and Cost of Two Surgeons versus Single-Surgeon Cystectomy with Urinary Diversion Show Comments PDF Print E-mail
  
Tuesday, 29 March 2005
BERKELEY, CA (UroToday Inc.) - Bladder cancer is known to be one of the most expensive cancers in terms of healthcare expense from the time of diagnosis to death.

BERKELEY, CA (UroToday Inc.) - Bladder cancer is known to be one of the most expensive cancers in terms of healthcare expense from the time of diagnosis to death. In 2001, the estimated cost of the over 7,100 radical cystectomies performed in the United States was $54,153 per patient. The average length of hospital stay was approximately 14 days with the incidence of post-operative complications being 29%, even at institutions that perform a large number of procedures.

Given the increased emphasis on cost containment and efficiency, as well as the desire to reduce the incidence of post-operative complications, A. T Ludwig and colleagues from the University of Iowa, have been performing some radical cystectomies with urinary diversion (C & D) using a two-team approach. The second surgeon performed the diversion portion of the procedure after the first surgeon had completed the cystectomy. In a retrospective study published in the Month, 2005 issue of Urology, they compared the procedure related charges, hospital charges, operating room time, length of stay and complication rate between a group of patients undergoing C & D with either a two-surgeon or a single-surgeon approach.

They retrospectively analyzed a total of 63 patients with bladder cancer who underwent C & D. Two surgeons sequentially performed the cystectomy with ileal conduit (IC, n = 17) or neobladder (NBL, n = 18), or a single surgeon performed both the cystectomy and IC (n = 21) or NBL (n = 7).

Analysis revealed that the two-surgeon team had significantly greater surgeon charges but significantly lower anesthesia charges for their two types of urinary diversion. The single surgeon procedures resulted in 60% and 32% lower surgeon charges respectively for IC or NBL, but respectively 23% and 22% greater anesthesia charges for the ileal conduit or NBL. Overall, no significant difference in charges was noted for the IC group, while for the neobladder group, the reduced anesthesia and OR time did not completely offset the increased total physician charges. Interestingly, overall hospital charges were about equal for both approaches to C & D.

A close look at the operative durations showed that the median operative minutes for the ileal conduit cases by the single surgeon was 488 versus 379 for the two-surgeon team. For the neobladder cases, the surgical minutes for the single-surgeon cases were 574 versus 424 for the two-surgeon team. Therefore, for two surgeons there was an average reduction in surgical duration of 22% for the ileal conduit cases and 26% for the neobladder cases. No significant differences were seen in complication rates between the two groups with complication rates equal at around 29%.

In conclusion, this study shows that a two-team approach to radical cystectomy did not compromise outcomes and has the potential to reduce costs secondary to decreased operating room duration.

Urology. 2005 Month; 65(3):488-492

Written by Michael J. Metro, MD, a Contributing Editor with UroToday.

Reader Comments

Please log-in or register in order to submit comments.

Powered by AkoComment!

 
User Rating: / 0
PoorBest


 

Bookmark and Share
< Prev   Next >

Member's Section

Login

Sign Up

Quick Search

Meet the Expert


All Experts


Featured Conference

Media and Publisher

Advertising Rates
Reprints

Working with Industry

Case Studies
Sponsorship Opportunities

Bladder Cancer
Sponsored By