Home
February 2010 March 2010 April 2010
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
Week 9 1 2 3 4 5 6
Week 10 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
Week 11 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Week 12 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
Week 13 28 29 30 31
Reach urologists

Prognostic Significance of Nondiagnostic Molecular Changes in Urine Detected by UroVysion Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization During Surveillance for Bladder Cancer - Abstract Show Comments PDF Print E-mail
  
Monday, 01 December 2008

Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.

To determine the outcomes for patients with nondiagnostic fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) (ie, < 4 gains of chromosomes 3, 7, or 17 in < /=3 cells). FISH detects urothelial carcinoma and is especially beneficial in patients with negative or atypical urine cytology findings. A positive result is defined as a gain of >/=2 chromosomes (3, 7, or 17) in 4 cells, isolated loss of 9p21 in 12 cells, or isolated gains of only 1 chromosome in >/=10% of cells. Most FISH-positive patients will develop recurrent urothelial carcinoma within 1 year.

We compared the data from 149 patients with a nondiagnostic FISH result and >/=30 months of follow-up with the data from patients with a negative FISH result from the same period. The time to conversion to a positive FISH result or the development of a bladder tumor was recorded.

Patients with nondiagnostic FISH results had significantly greater rates of progression to positive FISH findings or the development of a bladder tumor than did patients with negative FISH findings. Most progression occurred within 1 year. Patients with nondiagnostic FISH results and concurrent negative cytology and cystoscopy had a very low risk of developing recurrent disease, similar to that found with truly negative FISH results.

Nondiagnostic FISH results are related to a greater risk of progression to positive FISH results and tumor recurrence than those with negative FISH findings. However, after controlling for negative cytologic and cystoscopic status, a nondiagnostic FISH result does not appear to be an independent predictor of disease recurrence, and aggressive investigation is not warranted.

Written by:
Nguyen CT, Litt DB, Dolar SE, Ulchaker JC, Jones JS, Brainard JA.   Are you the author?

Go "Beyond the Abstract" - Read an Article Written by the Author for UroToday.com

Reference:
Urology. 2008 Nov 19. Epub ahead of print.
doi:10.1016/j.urology.2008.09.042

PubMed Abstract
PMID:19022486

 

Read an Editorial about this Article by a UroToday.com Contributing Medical Writer

UroToday.com Bladder Cancer Section

 

Reader Comments

Please log-in or register in order to submit comments.

Powered by AkoComment!

 
User Rating: / 1
PoorBest


 
Visitor Ratings:
Healthcare Professionals:
5 (1 votes)


Bookmark and Share

Member's Section

Login

Sign Up

Quick Search

Meet the Expert


All Experts



Featured Conference

Media and Publisher

Advertising Rates

Working with Industry

Case Studies
Sponsorship Opportunities

Bladder Cancer
Sponsored By