Home
June 2009 July 2009 August 2009
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
Week 27 1 2 3 4
Week 28 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Week 29 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
Week 30 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Week 31 26 27 28 29 30 31

16-MDCT Cystoscopy in the Evaluation of Neoplasms of the Urinary Bladder - Abstract Show Comments PDF Print E-mail
  
Friday, 21 March 2008

Department of Clinical Radiology, University Hospital of Ioannina, Leoforos S. Niarchou, 45500, Pl. Pargis, 2, 45332, Ioannina, Greece.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the utility of 16-MDCT cystoscopy in the detection of urinary bladder neoplasms in a high-risk population.

Fifty patients who presented with hematuria and a recent diagnosis or a history of bladder carcinoma underwent CT cystoscopy. All patients were examined in the supine and prone positions after bladder distention with room air. A detector configuration of 16 x 0.75 mm and a pitch of 1.2 was used. Virtual images were obtained with volume-rendered algorithms. Transverse tomographic slices, multiplanar reformatted images, and virtual images were prospectively evaluated separately and in combination. Conventional cystoscopy was considered the standard of reference for assessing the efficacy of MDCT cystoscopy in the detection of urinary bladder tumors.

Fifty-five (96%) of 57 urinary bladder lesions recognized at conventional cystoscopy were detected with MDCT cystoscopy. The size of the lesions ranged from 0.3 to 9.7 cm in diameter, including 18 lesions with a diameter of 0.5 cm or less. Transverse, multiplanar reformatted, and virtual images proved complementary for lesion detection.

MDCT cystoscopy is an accurate technique for the detection of urinary bladder neoplasms in patients at high risk, yielding satisfactory results in the identification of lesions smaller than 0.5 cm.

Written by
Tsampoulas C, Tsili AC, Giannakis D, Alamanos Y, Sofikitis N, Efremidis SC.

Reference
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008 Mar;190(3):729-35.
doi: 10.2214/AJR.07.3054

PubMed Abstract
PMID:18287445

UroToday.com Bladder Cancer Section

Reader Comments
Dr.
Written by This email address is being protected from spam bots, you need Javascript enabled to view it on 2008-03-23 14:37:11
It seems to me expensive and dangerous for the risk and frequency or radiations in the followup  
but is a possibility.

Please log-in or register in order to submit comments.

Powered by AkoComment!

 
User Rating: / 0
PoorBest


 

Bookmark and Share
< Prev   Next >

Member's Section

Login

Sign Up

Quick Search

Meet the Expert


All Experts


Featured Conference

Complete WUF 2009 Coverage

Media and Publisher

Advertising Rates
Reprints

Working with Industry

Case Studies
Sponsorship Opportunities

Bladder Cancer
Sponsored By