Home
October 2009 November 2009 December 2009
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
Week 45 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Week 46 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Week 47 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
Week 48 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Week 49 29 30

Bladder Cancer Detection Resource Center - Ask the Experts Show Comments PDF Print E-mail
  
Bladder Cancer Diagnosis and Monitoring Center

Ask the Expert

Complete User Guide






Podcast - Veterans’ Health: Bladder Cancer Diagnosis and Surveillance
Friday, 05 June 2009


Podcast - "Ask the Expert" - Military Veterans and Firefighters Have Been Identified at Increased Risk for Bladder Cancer. Please Compare and Contrast the Risk Factors Effecting These Patient Populations
Thursday, 04 June 2009







Superficial Bladder Cancer - TCC - A Presentation by Barry Stein, MD, Urologist

 





Superficial Bladder Cancer – Detection and Treatment in Review - A Presentation by Barry Stein, MD, Urologist

 





What Firefighters Should Know About Bladder Cancer - by Barry Stein, MD, Urologist

 

Powerpoint with Audio - Interview on Clinical Practice Experience with NMP22
Friday, August 15 2008

Podcast - "Ask the Expert" - We Tried NMP22 Five Years Ago when it First Came Out and after Receiving False Negatives, We Elected to not Continue its Use. Do you have Confidence in the Sensitivity of the Test?
Thursday, 17 July 2008

Podcast - "Ask the Expert" - I am Getting a Positive NMP22 result but a Negative Cystoscopy. What does it Mean?
Thursday, 17 July 2008

Podcast - "Ask the Expert" - Do You have an Opinion as to when the NMP22 Test Should be Run?
Thursday, 17 July 2008

Podcast - "Ask the Expert" - Should the NMP22 Test be Taken Prior to Cystoscopy or at the Same Patient Visit?
Thursday, 17 July 2008

Barry S. Stein, MD


  1. Q - What are the likely causes of false positive results from the NMP22 BladderChek Test and what should the follow-up protocol be for patients with this conflicting diagnosis?

    A - There are of course two types of "false-positives" for this test. True false+ and that is usually due to infection or sources of inflammation such as calculi etc. Then there are the apparent false+ in which no tumor is seen, but eventually the test is shown to be correct. That is of course the real issue- separating those two. I would be careful to rule out the apparent false + by repeat endoscopy, perhaps with biopsy and upper tract imaging.

  2. Q. Recent studies have suggested that the NMP22 BladderChek Test can be used as a "grading" tool. How can the test provide grading information?

    A - NMP 22 is not a grading tool per se. However, like most tests looking for cancer in the urine, it is more often positive with higher grade tumors. This is somewhat different than calling it a grading tool however.

  3. Q - Is the NMP22 BladderChek Test helpful for diagnosing tumors in the upper tract and how does use of the test change traditional imaging protocols for the detection of tumors in the upper tract?

    A - NMP 22 does not care if the tumor is in the upper tract or the bladder when it is positive. As mentioned in Q#1, when the NMP is positive and no tumor is seen, the upper tract should be evaluated. This could be with CT scan or retrogrades.


In order to ask Dr. Stein a question you must be a registered user of Urotoday.com and logged into the website. Submit your comment or question in the box below and it will be reviewed by our board and sent on to Dr. Stein for a response. Responses will be posted as soon UroToday.com receives them from the expert.

If you experience any technical difficulties please contact This email address is being protected from spam bots, you need Javascript enabled to view it .

Reader Comments

Please log-in or register in order to submit comments.

Powered by AkoComment!

 
User Rating: / 2
PoorBest


 
Visitor Ratings:
Healthcare Professionals:
5 (1 votes)

No Affiliation:
4 (1 votes)


Bookmark and Share

Member's Section

Login

Sign Up

Quick Search

Meet the Expert


All Experts


Featured Conference

Working with Industry

Case Studies
Sponsorship Opportunities