Home
February 2010 March 2010 April 2010
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
Week 9 1 2 3 4 5 6
Week 10 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
Week 11 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Week 12 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
Week 13 28 29 30 31

√ Survival Associated with Treatment vs. Observation of Localized Prostate Cancer in Elderly Men Show Comments PDF Print E-mail
  
Wednesday, 31 January 2007
Editor's Pick:     BERKELEY, CA (UroToday.com) - Without randomized trials of treatment vs. observation in elderly men with prostate cancer (CaP), it has been the assumption that these men will succumb to other causes.

According to a report in the December 13, 2006 issue of JAMA, this may not be the case and treatment may decrease the risk of prostate cancer death in these men.

The report studies 44,630 men ages 65 to 80 years with well or moderately differentiated CaP diagnosed between 1991 and 1999. The data regarding this cohort was acquired from the SEER database with linking to patient Medicare claims. Poorly differentiated tumors or locally advanced cancers were excluded due to the high risk for progression. Overall survival was defined as the interval from the date of diagnosis to the Medicare documented date of death. Comorbid variable were also evaluated and factored into the analysis, as they could bias towards observation or an increased probability of treatment related complications.

The patients were divided into 12,608 (28%) in the observation group and 32,022 (72%) in the treatment group. Treatment consisted of surgery or radiation therapy. The study period was 12 years long and 12,302 men (28%) had died; 37% of patients in the observation group and 24% in the treatment group. A proportional hazards model indicated that active treatment was associated with a significant improvement in survival in the overall cohort. This remained so after adjusting for individual co-morbidities. CaP was the cause of death in 314 men in the observation group and 612 men in the treatment group. Median overall survival in the treatment group was 55 months compared to 47 months in the observation group. Treatment was associated with reduced risk of death in men who received either surgery or radiation therapy.

While this report does not replace the need for randomized trials, it does suggest a survival advantage for elderly men with CaP who undergo active treatment. Several ongoing randomized trials are nearing completion and will shed further light onto this dilemma.

Yu-Ning Wong; Nandita Mitra; Gary Hudes; Russell Localio; J. Sanford Schwartz; Fei Wan; Chantal Montagnet; Katrina Armstrong

JAMA 2006; 296:2683-93.

read other UroToday.com Editors Picks

Prostate Cancer Section

Written by Christopher P. Evans, MD, a Contributing Editor with UroToday.

Reader Comments
Ass't.Professor of Urology, Univ. of Mi
Written by This email address is being protected from spam bots, you need Javascript enabled to view it on 2007-02-07 13:48:30
I think that grouping men age 65 with those age 80 is not meaningful. I think that many urologists would offer RRP or XRT to me in their 60's or early 70's who are healthy. Once a patient is older than 75 I feel that the treatment stategy changes.

Please log-in or register in order to submit comments.

Powered by AkoComment!

 
User Rating: / 0
PoorBest


 

Bookmark and Share
< Prev   Next >

Member's Section

Login

Sign Up

Quick Search

Meet the Expert


All Experts



Featured Conference

Working with Industry

Case Studies
Sponsorship Opportunities