Home
February 2010 March 2010 April 2010
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
Week 9 1 2 3 4 5 6
Week 10 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
Week 11 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Week 12 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
Week 13 28 29 30 31

A Shifted Paradigm for the Further Understanding, Evaluation, and Treatment of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms in Men: Focus on the Bladder Show Comments PDF Print E-mail
  
Monday, 03 April 2006
Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) are highly prevalent among older men and have a negative impact on health-related quality of life. Frequent comorbidity with potential prostatic disease adds complexity to the management of male LUTS.

Christopher R. Chapplea, Claus G. Roehrbornb
aThe Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, UK
bThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, Dallas, Texas, USA

Accepted 3 February 2006 published online 17 February 2006

Abstract

Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) are highly prevalent among older men and have a negative impact on health-related quality of life. Frequent comorbidity with potential prostatic disease adds complexity to the management of male LUTS. In this review, we discuss the pathophysiological conditions that underlie male LUTS, and examine the relationship between symptoms and urodynamic findings. The contribution of bladder dysfunction to male LUTS, with a particular emphasis on overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms, is explored. We also consider pharmacotherapeutic options for male LUTS. Pharmacotherapies that target the prostate (α1-receptor antagonists and 5α-reductase inhibitors) often fail to alleviate OAB symptoms, and may not be the most appropriate therapy for men with storage LUTS. Multiple studies have suggested that antimuscarinic therapy alone or in combination with α1-receptor antagonists improve OAB symptoms in men with and without bladder outlet obstruction. Although these agents may represent appropriate first-line therapies for men with OAB symptoms, the therapeutic potential of antimuscarinics alone or in combination with α1-receptor antagonists in this population should be evaluated in large-scale, well-designed clinical trials.

European Urology - 2006 04 (Vol. 49, Issue 4) p.651-659 Full Text

Reader Comments

Please log-in or register in order to submit comments.

Powered by AkoComment!

 
User Rating: / 0
PoorBest


 

Bookmark and Share
< Prev   Next >

Member's Section

Login

Sign Up

Quick Search